Jump to content

Fan Ownership Working Group


Springburnjag
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Semi Nurainen said:

There were half a dozen (or more) posters who were against the consortium form the start who had no trust in same; they criticised everything they did.

There was no valid critique only a campaign to undermine consortium bid before any opportunity to get started. It was a barrage from a small group with nothing positive to say.

Funnily enough I don't recall you pointing that out at the time. You didn't complain about polarisation  of the fans as a result of this.

So don't try to feed us any bogus neutrality about your position.

 

 

The way I look at this is that it is only a small number who are resolutely negative. That is their right of course. The consortium was clearly a very bad idea from a PTFC perspective. I suspect 99.9 % of fans knew this.  Most fans will wait and see what happens next and come to a view as events unfold. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dl1971 said:

The way I look at this is that it is only a small number who are resolutely negative. That is their right of course. The consortium was clearly a very bad idea from a PTFC perspective. I suspect 99.9 % of fans knew this.  Most fans will wait and see what happens next and come to a view as events unfold. 

 

I suspect you are talking shite, and making up statistics.

'Wait and see what happens next' is a brilliant strategy. I'm sure most successful businesses are run exactly along these lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Emsca said:

I recall that Dunfermline Jag ( solicitor ) was asked to go on the Inerim Board? Is that correct?

If so, Dunfermline Jag- can you let us know what is going on?

Has anybody left the Interim Board?  Is J Low back involved with the running of the Club?

Not asking you to divulge any sensitive information just clarify some points.

Thanks

 

 

 

I wasn't asked to join the Interim Board and so I cannot answer your questions.

I have been asked to join the working group tasked with putting a fans organisation into place to receive the shares in March 2020. I have agreed to do that.

I think it's worth making the basic point that everything that happens with PTFC is down to the Interim Board who are responsible in turn to Three Black Cats as the majority shareholder. The working group has nothing to do with the running of the club and I don't expect to have access to any inside info in the future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Semi Nurainen said:

There were half a dozen (or more) posters who were against the consortium form the start who had no trust in same; they criticised everything they did.

There was no valid critique only a campaign to undermine consortium bid before any opportunity to get started. It was a barrage from a small group with nothing positive to say.

Funnily enough I don't recall you pointing that out at the time. You didn't complain about polarisation  of the fans as a result of this.

So don't try to feed us any bogus neutrality about your position.

 

 

There is no comparison.

I said from day one that I didn't like the idea of the consortium bid. I didn't want Thistle to be owned by a large consortium which had no previous connection with the club. I knew nothing about the consortium and never claimed to. Nor did I have to, because regardless of their intention I would have been unhappy to see Thistle owned on this basis. My objection was based purely on principle and I made absolutely no attempt to hide this. I explained openly why I felt this way. I also acknowledged that others would feel differently and that that was completely understandable; to some people results are everything; to me there are other things which are important.

If people have objections to fan ownership, whether in principle or for practical reasons then let them express this. That, in my view, is a completely valid position to take. It is not the same as undermining the process with rumour, personal slights on the people involved, a constant implied suggestion of inside knowledge that may or may not be real, and ridicule of those who take an opposing view. 

And I object to your reference to "bogus neutrality". There is nothing false in the position that I have taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, allyo said:

There is no comparison.

I said from day one that I didn't like the idea of the consortium bid. I didn't want Thistle to be owned by a large consortium which had no previous connection with the club. I knew nothing about the consortium and never claimed to. Nor did I have to, because regardless of their intention I would have been unhappy to see Thistle owned on this basis. My objection was based purely on principle and I made absolutely no attempt to hide this. I explained openly why I felt this way. I also acknowledged that others would feel differently and that that was completely understandable; to some people results are everything; to me there are other things which are important.

If people have objections to fan ownership, whether in principle or for practical reasons then let them express this. That, in my view, is a completely valid position to take. It is not the same as undermining the process with rumour, personal slights on the people involved, a constant implied suggestion of inside knowledge that may or may not be real, and ridicule of those who take an opposing view. 

And I object to your reference to "bogus neutrality". There is nothing false in the position that I have taken.

You have just perfectly described some of the TFE position in relation to its critics, but you are unable or unwilling to see that. Some of us can.

I don't want Thistle to be owned or directed or influenced  by people who  I wouldn't  trust to run a whelk stall. In some cases the track record is there to see for those who want to : Caldwell's appointment (previous record - 3 wins out of 39 games); various  PR disasters (Chesterfield-gate, Doolan-gate) The comparison is  perfect.

I don't know how I'll  sleep tonight worrying about your objection … 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Semi, I may only be getting one side of this argument. I don't even know what you're talking about when you refer to "the TFE position in relation to its critics". If I did then maybe I would be able to see it.

Regarding the record of the previous chairman, I'm sorry, but the relationship between that and TFE is just part of the rumour and innuendo that I speak of. If TFE is made up of Jacqui Low, Javeajag and Springburn Jag then you have a point. That isn't my understanding. Call me naïve.

Anyway, would you prefer if I insulted you back?

Edited by allyo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Semi Nurainen said:

I don't give a flying f---, frankly.

I would 'prefer' if people would give the Polyanna make-believe world of 'fan ownership' an iota of critical appraisal in the same way that I would 'prefer' it if we had sunshine, clean air, and world peace.

Helpful. Cant you debate or discuss in a reasonable manner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Semi Nurainen said:

I don't give a flying f---, frankly.

I would 'prefer' if people would give the Polyanna make-believe world of 'fan ownership' an iota of critical appraisal in the same way that I would 'prefer' it if we had sunshine, clean air, and world peace.

That's how I imagine Finland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dl1971 said:

Helpful. Cant you debate or discuss in a reasonable manner?

Funny you didn't ask that when the previous poster attacked individuals on here as 'as undermining the process with rumour, personal slights on the people involved, a constant implied suggestion of inside knowledge that may or may not be real, and ridicule of those who take an opposing view.'

I mean funny peculiar, not funny ha-ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Semi Nurainen said:

There were half a dozen (or more) posters who were against the consortium form the start who had no trust in same; they criticised everything they did.

There was no valid critique only a campaign to undermine consortium bid before any opportunity to get started. It was a barrage from a small group with nothing positive to say.

Funnily enough I don't recall you pointing that out at the time. You didn't complain about polarisation  of the fans as a result of this.

So don't try to feed us any bogus neutrality about your position.

 

 

Ok I was in that camp ...so factually can you explain 

1. what did the consortium do ? 
to my knowledge they did nothing (!)except bid for 55% of the shares .... no statements , no plans , no fan engagement .... that was part of the problem 

2. on what basis was there anything to say positively on the consortium bid ? 
there was no proposal circulated , no plan jj tried to pretend there was one but couldn’t provide it , No press statements ... literally nada 

3 what was there to critique if no information was provided ?

well I guess who were the consortium - which was never disclosed (!) except paul conway it later turned out chien lee was never involved , or we could look at their business track record except it wasn’t provided or we could look at Barnsley and when you did it was not good 

no coherent support for the consortium was ever put forward other than 

- they were business people as though that in its self meant anything as we all know there are all types of business people 

- they would run the club at a profit ... I never quite understood why that was intrinsically good as it’s just taking money out the club 

- they were a better option than fan ownership .... in my view they weren’t even though I’ve never been that keen on it 

we are now where we are and we need to make the best of it 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, allyo said:

Semi, I may only be getting one side of this argument. I don't even know what you're talking about when you refer to "the TFE position in relation to its critics". If I did then maybe I would be able to see it.

Regarding the record of the previous chairman, I'm sorry, but the relationship between that and TFE is just part of the rumour and innuendo that I speak of. If TFE is made up of Jacqui Low, Javeajag and Springburn Jag then you have a point. That isn't my understanding. Call me naïve.

Anyway, would you prefer if I insulted you back?

Can I just clarify for the 100th time that I have no connection to, involvement with or knowledge of TFE other than looking at their Facebook page 
I know this doesn’t suit some people but it is the truth , I have always had reservations on fan ownership but given the choice between that and the consortium it was the better choice 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this on another forum

 

 

“The Club doesn’t own the Stadium clean and free.

Three Black Cats owns the entirety of the Bing and the Main Stand. In fact, since Firhill Developments Limited no longer owns those parts of the ground, and the Club was a major shareholder *in Firhill Developments*, the Club technically has a financial stake in *less* of the stadium now than it did a month ago” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Norgethistle said:

Saw this on another forum

 

 

“The Club doesn’t own the Stadium clean and free.

Three Black Cats owns the entirety of the Bing and the Main Stand. In fact, since Firhill Developments Limited no longer owns those parts of the ground, and the Club was a major shareholder *in Firhill Developments*, the Club technically has a financial stake in *less* of the stadium now than it did a month ago” 

I think that’s sort of right .....though clearly 3BC own the club and therefore own all of Firhill 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...