JAGS v fake jags..

[Barney Rubble]

Whoever was on the back post for the second goal (Banzo?) has a case to answer.

[lady-isobel-barnett]

As often as not opposition double up on Tiffoney, anticipating him cutting in. Our second goal involved a perfect cross off his weaker foot. More of that and the extra man on him will be inconsequential.

Don't like commenting too much when I wasn't at the match, but it looked like both sides used the width of the pitch well. That certainly was the case with ICT in the first game up there, when they opened up our midfield and defence.  That looked the case again judging by the first two goals we lost.

[Fearchar]

Our team seemed to allow ICT to use their main tactic,  the long diagonal ball. I was mystified that this wasn't snuffed out by pressing: it was as if our players had been told to stand off the opposition. The result? Attacks to restore the score three times. Once would have been understandable; twice very lax; three times, cause for concern about tactics.

[MonehJags]

16 hours ago, Barney Rubble said:

Whoever was on the back post for the second goal (Banzo?) has a case to answer.

I have to agree. It was a shamefully diabolical effort. He would have been as well going into the dressing room for half time when they got their corner. 

Edited February 11, 2022 by MonehJags

[Albert's Ghost]

Marking at the first goal wasn't exactly stellar either.