Jump to content

League Cup 2022-23


elevenone
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, elevenone said:

Just reading back on prize money.  So a win on Sat guarantees us a minimum of 50k as well as the 17k for tv game vs Killie.  A real incentive to be topping the group after Montrose game.

I was wondering if that's part of the reason why we are holding off signing another striker. An extra £50k would  make a huge difference in who we could attract.

Might even be enough to bring in another player if we got a draw that meant more tv money and/or a sizeable attendance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, jags on tour said:

Earlier in the competition Elgin (I think) fielded an ineligible player vs Ayr and Ayr were awarded a 3-0 afterwards, now Hibs have apparently fielded an ineligible player vs Morton last night, I wonder if they will do the same and award Morton a 3-0 win. 

Stranraer also charged for same from their game on Tuesday night although with 1 point from their 4 matches I doubt it will make much difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2022 at 1:48 PM, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

Three points:

1) The Community Shield (Formerly ‘Charity Shield’) was always a showpiece game at Wembley between two champions in English football competition (Top tier league/FA cup. It’s primary purpose is to raise the profile of English football again, the top level, after the summer break, and whet the appetite before League (top tier) action gets underway seven days later. Winning it is not greatly ‘celebrated’ (beyond those in the stadium) and few teams or their fans would want to make a fuss  over winning it! (Or losing it for that matter!)

2) Some parts of the world may have only a few teams, but whether THEY call it a league or not, it can’t be seen in the same way as the multi-member format which is most prevalent, in most countries of the world. 

3) My main point was to criticise what I see as a basic unfairness, ie Scottish Premier League teams gaining an advantage by not having to play lower league teams from the start, having fewer games to play (fewer banana skins to slip on and lose/get knocked out.) I don’t care for seeding (in club football) and giving teams a ‘bye’ into the next round. At one time Scottish League Cup sections had all the teams from the top tier. The (‘Not All  Are Actually..’) Champions League does a lot of this, mainly to placate European top teams (who would love to break away and form an elite European Super League.) These clubs want to be in the competition as long as possible ( for the spondulux it brings in prize money) and so does UEFA, for TV money purposes! I mentioned Thistle playing 12 games to win the 1971/72 League Cup. Last year’s was won  by playing and winning just four games! Further evidence: How neutrals loved seeing Rangers beaten by Berwick in the 1967 Scottish Cup and Thistle beating Celtic in the 1971 Scottish League Cup. These two games stand out amongst possibly 100s or 1000s of other cup games in Scottish cup competition history.

NB: Interestingly in season 1966/67, when Celtic won the European Cup, participant teams were unseeded. The following season, 1967/68 Celtic went out of the cup in the first round to Dynamo Kiev! No seeding and the holders out in the first round-not what UEFA would have wanted, but it was part of the competition. And oddly, or (IMO) not oddly at all, most fans (apart from those who support the ‘giants’) actually prefer to see major upsets and giant-killing. It’s often what makes football the exciting, thrilling game it can be, rather than being boringly-predictable. But, of course ‘boringly-predictable’ often suits, the ‘Suits’ at the SFA, the FA, UEFA and FIFA etc! And, I have to say, these days, ‘boringly-predictable’ too often passes for ‘normal football product’ these days!

For as long as I remember, the Scottish cup and English FA cup has always introduced the top teams at a later round, so it’s hardly new

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2022 at 10:55 AM, Dick Dastardly said:

It depends on what you call "a national trophy". Many nations have  preseason trophy played between the league and cup winners (eg English Community Shield or whatever it is called this season). Arguably that would be a national trophy won by winning one game.

Also, Scilly Isles have a national football league with just 2 teams. They play each other many times for the league, but again the cup is over just 1 game. Would that be a national trophy ? Are Scilly Isles any different from Scotland/N. Ireland/ Wales/England when it comes to "national trophy"

Without going into  details, your post has encapsulated why I've never really given a hoot about the Challenge Cup (although I was at the final, whenever it was.) It's a "sub-competition."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Duke Gekantawa said:

For as long as I remember, the Scottish cup and English FA cup has always introduced the top teams at a later round, so it’s hardly new

It may not be new, although it is recent in terms of the length of time the competitions have been going. But not all changes are for the better of all concerned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

Yes, there are many FA cup rounds starting in August with non-league clubs competing during the previous year (in the same season) before English higher league sides join in the third round, and Scottish better  league sides also join from the third round. But, not that many years ago Scottish top tier sides played in the original league cup sections as they were called or groups-as where Thistle are playing at the moment. Now the best placed Scottish Premier League sides join the League Cup competition when there are only four rounds left to play incl. final. This is to supposedly help Scottish teams in Europe. But, ironically teams like Dunfermline, Aberdeen, Dundee United, Dundee, Hibernian, Hearts, St Johnstone did BETTER in Europe-a few substantially better, when they didn’t get this advantage, many years ago!

I don’t know if it is to help them as much as to do with clashes with EUFa schedules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

Well, as you say, it may be primarily because of a clash with European schedules, but undoubtedly only having to negotiate just four games successfully before you end up with a gleaming  silver trophy in your hands, must be an advantage in winning THAT domestic national cup. Thistle (along with all the teams who have played in the group stages-incl. eg  Prem. League Killie) will  ALREADY have played four games by 5pm tomorrow evening!)

I understand your point about having played 4 games before the end of July(actually it will be 5, counting the Dundee game), but not so much the no of games to win a trophy. There are only 42 teams in the SPFL, so juggling those numbers means the maximum to win in  a knockout competition would be 6, but most likely 5.
The next round of the league cup isn’t until the end of August. I think the number of games played in the groups won’t really have a bearing. Unless your team has picked up a suspension or injury,of course

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2022 at 11:50 AM, elevenone said:

Just reading back on prize money.  So a win on Sat guarantees us a minimum of 50k as well as the 17k for tv game vs Killie.  A real incentive to be topping the group after Montrose game.

That's decent-a lot more than I realised it was worth. Mon the Jags-ignore that rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

No, my point is Thistle have played FOUR LEAGUE CUP GAMES so far. (The Dundee game is a league game) If they go through, (which seems likely ie beating Montrose) they will have a FIFTH game to play etc. ie for Thistle to (potentially) win the League cup they would have 4+ all the rest of the games. Celtic, Rangers etc have ONLY FOUR games to WIN the Cup. (It doesn’t matter when the games are played, it’s the number of them I’m highlighting.) Having to play MORE games to win a competition must surely have a bearing on the ease with which a team can win a trophy. Thistle had to play TWELVE games to win a League cup in 1971. That’s 12 x 90 minutes (+) = 1080 minutes, whilst eg Celtic or Rangers can do it in 360 minutes, AND they’ve got huge squads of players with many young players (one they’ve just purloined from us) at their disposal. They can pack their subs bench with loads of talent. It’s the same in other competitions eg FA Cup or *(Not all) Champions Lge with one major difference. In those, there are STILL a significant number of rounds for the teams which enter later to negotiate to win the trophy. The * has a group stage before knockout. Scotland’s League cup with just FOUR games to win a major national trophy is unusual.
 

I think the SPFL should, instead of giving those top tier teams what amounts to a bye, to avoid a number of rounds, make them play and they could utilise their WHOLE squads, younger players etc.  They’re always saying  they’re young players don’t get enough games and asking to put a Colt team into the lower leagues, so why don’t they use them, or some of them HERE, in the Scottish League Cup group stage etc?
 

The truth is a competition receives respect for the amount of difficulty involved in winning it. Winning just four games to get a NATIONAL trophy doesn’t meet that requirement (IMO) and makes it more like the (old) Glasgow Cup! (Before THAT was left to the Colts!)

I kind of understand where you are coming from, but I thought I addressed the issues of playing an uneven number of games to win the trophy,(ok 4 to 8 is a big difference) and the small number of games to win a trophy in Scotland in a knockout competition? Regarding Colt teams, there is a lot of opposition to their inclusion in the Challenge cup - I don’t think it would go down too well if some of that squad was used in the league cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The League Cup format was changed to remove pre-season friendlies.

The positives are it brings competitive football earlier which players want over friendlies.

It increases crowds which helps clubs revenue.

They recently changed the regional format as clubs were playing each other to often.  It works. It's logical and fits in with Scottish football setup.

The clubs higher up the pyramid often have players playing longer in international teams so need a rest.  They also need to prepare for European competitions.

 

Edited by Lambies Lost Doo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like this cup format.  Especially as it is not regionalized.

  I understand the idea of having all the teams in right away - and apart from the Motherwell mid week game I think they could all play undisturbed.  The games could be used as prep for the Euro games.

Also it would be a gate turner for some smaller teams to have a Celtic/Rangers clash.

I'm for anything that reduces the OF's abundant advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

PS: It seems TODAY,  whilst some other Premier League teams eg Kilmarnock  are tasked with the serious business of negotiating the final early round of the Scottish League Cup group stage, Rangers (safely through with what amounts to a bye), are playing a lucrative, meaningless friendly match with …Tottenham Hotspur! They’re not ‘resting’  players for the futures stresses/ strains of European competition qualification that lie ahead, they’re taking part in an unnecessary showpiece friendly! What would they give, to make today’s fixture a REAL ‘FIXTURE’  EVERY season …in the English Premiership, I wonder?!!

Please note that Rangers usually get a bye to the Final by playing the weakest team from every round.

It's the same in any Cup they enter.

Their game today can be afforded in footballing terms, due to the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, denismcquadeno.eleven said:

THREE top tier teams exited the Scottish League cup today-Hibs, St Mirren and St Johnstone, which surely proves the point that the early group stage cannot be seen as a foregone conclusion. Those Premier League teams who don’t HAVE to go through this phase of the competition, joining in the last-16 undoubtedly get an advantage by doing so. No doubt Hibernian, St Mirren and St Johnstone wish now, THEY had had that advantage too! If we eventually see one of THOSE ‘favoured’ teams eg Rangers, Celtic, Hearts etc, running around Hampden with  the trophy, celebrating, with ‘We are the Champions’ playing in the background (or something similar) we should also perhaps reflect on that basic unfairness which is part of this competition, that HELPED them to do it! 

Gawny stop using capitals every few words, your posts are giving me heart palpitations.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MonehJags said:

Just to add to the sense of unfairness, I believe as we will be 'unseeded', we will be the away side in the next round.

Yep let the Old Firm have their glamour friendlies under the pretence of having Euro games so bypass the group stages and get a nice home tie in last 16 against an unseeded team effectively ensuring a straight to quarters minimum every year.  We can’t have Doncaster upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, elevenone said:

Yep let the Old Firm have their glamour friendlies under the pretence of having Euro games so bypass the group stages and get a nice home tie in last 16 against an unseeded team effectively ensuring a straight to quarters minimum every year.  We can’t have Doncaster upset.

Have to think that there are bigger things to worry about at home before any perceived advantage to bigger teams comes close to the top of the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MonehJags said:

Just to add to the sense of unfairness, I believe as we will be 'unseeded', we will be the away side in the next round.

Pretty sure the draw is, seeded team at home, then unseeded at home, then seeded at home, then unseeded, and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BILL.H said:

Pretty sure the draw is, seeded team at home, then unseeded at home, then seeded at home, then unseeded, and so on.

Makes you wonder whether the likes of UEFA are consulted on this kind of rigging of competitions.

Actually, I think I probably know the answer, and then also to the answer that would proably come to a follow-follow up question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'd far rather the round of 16 was an unseeded draw, I'd also want to see bookings in the group stages wiped for the knockout stages and then wipedfor the start of next season's competition.  It's hard enough for teams to win the Cup from the group stage but even harder if you have suspensions hanging over from the group stage. Although Hibs amongst a few clubs must think bookings are just ignored whenever they happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...