Jump to content

Thistle Weir grassroots teams gone


avie-man
 Share

Recommended Posts

Players and parents turned up to training during the week to find the teams have been cut with immediate effect.

This is the club who told the fans they didn't need their money.  All done on the hush as usual again, with nothing from the club as of yet. More transparency from the KGB than Firhill these days.

Edited by avie-man
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, avie-man said:

Players and parents turned up to training during the week to find the teams have been cut with immediate effect.

This is the club who told the fans they didn't need their money.  All done on the hush as usual again, with nothing from the club as of yet. More transparency from the KGB than Firhill these days.

Good to see Jaqui Lowe is protecting the legacy of her friend Colin Weir 

Total shitfest at Firhill just now , no direction, no template for our future, not good 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One for TJF. As I understand it just about every practical fan ownership model precludes fan involvement in the day to day running of the Club, setting budgets etc. From the EGM if I heard right the Hearts/St Mirren Supporter groups retain membership control over certain issues. These crown jewels being matters like change of team/club colours, moving stadium. I take that to also include  issues that would have a serious irreversible impact on the Club.

So my question is, if/when we are properly established as a fan owned club would closure or major wholesale changes to the Youth Academy be considered a crown jewel?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, lady-isobel-barnett said:

One for TJF. As I understand it just about every practical fan ownership model precludes fan involvement in the day to day running of the Club, setting budgets etc. From the EGM if I heard right the Hearts/St Mirren Supporter groups retain membership control over certain issues. These crown jewels being matters like change of team/club colours, moving stadium. I take that to also include  issues that would have a serious irreversible impact on the Club.

So my question is, if/when we are properly established as a fan owned club would closure or major wholesale changes to the Youth Academy be considered a crown jewel?   

The chair categorically stated they did not need our funding. I’m sure this could have been an outlay we could have helped in if asked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thistle Weir Youth Academy Limited is a separate entity to Partick Thistle Football Club Limited. It has always annoyed me that over recent years we have become so bitty for want of a better word. The football club separate to the youth academy, PropCo lurking in the background, The Jags Trust and the PTFC Trust, etc.

My hope was that when TJF became the majority shareholder we could start to get eveything under one roof but now that does not seem to be an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, lady-isobel-barnett said:

Not exactly answering my hypothetical question, Norge. 

Hypothetically a true fan ownership model, that raises funds would fund the things it’s membership deems right, obviously the Fan Ownership board would make recommendations based on input from the fans and the wider community, the grassroots I would say would fall in this category.

The problem is, the fan ownership vehicle chosen, has no income and does not communicate with its beneficiaries. So even if it had money it wouldn’t know what fans wanted it allocated to, and the opposite scenario is also true even if it had communicated with the beneficiaries it has no bank account or funds to fulfill their wishes. 
 

Things could have been so much different if the real fan ownership model was chosen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The evidence that Thistle Weir Academy teams are a good use of money doesn't stack up. Stuart Bannigan has obviously made lots of appearances for the first team, but actually signed for the club several years before Thistle Weir was ever started. Other than him, there are no Academy players who have made a substantial impact. Players like Liam Lindsay and Kevin Nisbet left and made the club little money.

Colin Weir should have spent his money on first team signings which would have kept us in the Premier League.

It's a nice idea but in an organisation which has to be as financially lean as possible, the Academy doesn't justify the investment. It doesn't work to benefit the men's first team of PTFC, which should always be the major focus.

Edited by milhouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very narrow minded view. Just for starters it doesn’t take into account the creation of the next generation of Thistle fans and their parents who could be bringing revenue for years to come. What about potential sponsors brought in due to child/relative playing for a junior side ?

The combination of Nesbit, Lindsey and Hendry brought significant income, almost certainly more than the cost of running the program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, milhouse said:

The evidence that Thistle Weir Academy teams are a good use of money doesn't stack up. Stuart Bannigan has obviously made lots of appearances for the first team, but actually signed for the club several years before Thistle Weir was ever started. Other than him, there are no Academy players who have made a substantial impact. Players like Liam Lindsay and Kevin Nisbet left and made the club little money.

Colin Weir should have spent his money on first team signings which would have kept us in the Premier League.

It's a nice idea but in an organisation which has to be as financially lean as possible, the Academy doesn't justify the investment. It doesn't work to benefit the men's first team of PTFC, which should always be the major focus.

I think it is difficult to define the success or failure of any academy on the amount that the parent club makes from selling players on. It seems to me that most players move on at the end of their contracts and there is no money involved - maybe some development fee for younger players. 
There will be other players that have slipped the mind.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Dick Dastardly said:

A very narrow minded view. Just for starters it doesn’t take into account the creation of the next generation of Thistle fans and their parents who could be bringing revenue for years to come. What about potential sponsors brought in due to child/relative playing for a junior side ?

The combination of Nesbit, Lindsey and Hendry brought significant income, almost certainly more than the cost of running the program.

I don't think PTFC ever received any sort of transfer fee for Kevin Nisbet but I'm happy to be corrected on this.

Most parents and children will be Old Firm fans, I think the "next generation of fans" is a negligible effect. I think we'd be more likely to be successful signing first team players released from elsewhere who are a bit disgruntled and want to prove themselves.

To me the success and failure of the academy is solely based on whether it benefits the men's first team of PTFC, whether with good players directly from the Academy, or with money from sale of players put directly back to the playing budget. There is little evidence of success of Thistle Weir on this basis.

It's nice having wee kids in red and yellow tops running around on the pitch at Firhill at half time etc., but there's no evidence that it's going to get PTFC in the top flight of Scottish football and help to keep us there. Academies are a luxury not applicable to PTFC.

Edited by milhouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dick Dastardly said:

The combination of Nesbit, Lindsey and Hendry brought significant income, almost certainly more than the cost of running the program.

I would also add Aiden Fitzpatrick and Penrice (the latter was a technically a swap for Tiffoney, but this is as good as a fee considering we really wanted tiff and would have had to pay a fee otherwise)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, milhouse said:

The evidence that Thistle Weir Academy teams are a good use of money doesn't stack up. Stuart Bannigan has obviously made lots of appearances for the first team, but actually signed for the club several years before Thistle Weir was ever started. Other than him, there are no Academy players who have made a substantial impact. Players like Liam Lindsay and Kevin Nisbet left and made the club little money.

Colin Weir should have spent his money on first team signings which would have kept us in the Premier League.

It's a nice idea but in an organisation which has to be as financially lean as possible, the Academy doesn't justify the investment. It doesn't work to benefit the men's first team of PTFC, which should always be the major focus.

I think Colin Weir was probably more motivated to support community projects via the club than to simply throw money at the first team.

It's rather too simple to declare how Mr Weir "should have spent his money."

Edited by Jaggernaut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...