Jump to content

Lewis Budinauckas


Recommended Posts

Deserved Player of the Month in July, thanks to shut-outs, penalty saves, yet immediately sidelined--again--for an incoming, on-loan keeper with less experience. If I were him I'd be raging. And I don't agree with "just keep training and your time will come" platitude, because it looks like basically, despite what gets said, and despite how well he might play, he's just not fancied by the management team, at least not more than reluctantly as a back-up.

If his agent saw the opportunity for a move, I'd understand if KB went for it.

Edited by Jaggernaut
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Bud Light be in goals on Sunday or are Hearts ok with McFarlane playing?

I think Bud light will have appreciated the security of a 2 year deal.

If he left in the summer in search of being first choice then he would probably be looking at League 1 and part-time football. If we get promoted and he gets even a few games in the premier league he's much more likely to get the opportunity of being a number 1 at a fulltime club.

Also given he's only 24 there's every chance he improves and becomes our main goalkeeper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, laukat said:

Will Bud Light be in goals on Sunday or are Hearts ok with McFarlane playing?

I think Bud light will have appreciated the security of a 2 year deal.

If he left in the summer in search of being first choice then he would probably be looking at League 1 and part-time football. If we get promoted and he gets even a few games in the premier league he's much more likely to get the opportunity of being a number 1 at a fulltime club.

Also given he's only 24 there's every chance he improves and becomes our main goalkeeper

Overall, agreed, but that "every chance" of improving surely depends on playing, and it looks like that's going to be very limited again this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jaggernaut said:

Overall, agreed, but that "every chance" of improving surely depends on playing, and it looks like that's going to be very limited again this season. 

It's a kinda Catch22. We don't want to buy a goalie as that would send out a bad message to Young Bud and for that matter to the even Younger Storey. So we do the next best thing we bring a player in on loan. But the parent club are only going to loan the player if he's guaranteed playing time. 

That's maybe not the best example of a Catch22 but It's a bit of a conundrum all the same. Especially for goalies who are never routinely subbed 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, lady-isobel-barnett said:

It's a kinda Catch22. We don't want to buy a goalie as that would send out a bad message to Young Bud and for that matter to the even Younger Storey. So we do the next best thing we bring a player in on loan. But the parent club are only going to loan the player if he's guaranteed playing time. 

That's maybe not the best example of a Catch22 but It's a bit of a conundrum all the same. Especially for goalies who are never routinely subbed 

 

Pretty sure we can’t guarantee anymore than one or two games to any player. As far as goalkeepers are concerned, I think you can get a sense of how a keepers going to do by how he performs at penalties. And McFarlane was nowhere near any of the penalties vs Stenhousemuir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lenziejag said:

Pretty sure we can’t guarantee anymore than one or two games to any player. As far as goalkeepers are concerned, I think you can get a sense of how a keepers going to do by how he performs at penalties. And McFarlane was nowhere near any of the penalties vs Stenhousemuir.

I assumed that MacFarlane had been preferred over Bud due to his familiarity playing v Stenny (6 times last season?). Possible that had we played another side Bud would have kept his place and maybe been first choice just now. Besides perhaps history is repeating itself in so much as our worst penalty saver ever was as often as not in goals in our promotional season back in 12/13. 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lady-isobel-barnett said:

I assumed that MacFarlane had been preferred over Bud due to his familiarity playing v Stenny (6 times last season?). Possible that had we played another side Bud would have kept his place and maybe been first choice just now. Besides perhaps history is repeating itself in so much as our worst penalty saver ever was as often as not in goals in our promotional season back in 12/13. 😊

Was Fox our worst ever? I remember him making a crucial penalty save in one of the cups which prevented an embarrassing exit to Cowdenbeath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Lenziejag said:

Maybe it is the case with a tall keeper that the target the opposition have to aim for is smaller , the result being that the shots are off target more ?

Didn’t work when I went in goal. I am 6’3” and the ball kept flying past me with incredible accuracy.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2026 at 5:22 PM, Dick Dastardly said:

We also have a complication with Josh. He is still a Thistle player, and no guarantee that Doncaster will buy him. He was only used as a sub on Saturday, so he may end up back at Firhill. What we don’t want is to have 3 first team keepers on the books 

If this happens, Clarke returns in January ( and McFarlane returns to Hearts), I think its only fair that Bud is our No 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Only way Bud can improve without getting Game Time is Coaching & we cut Kenny Arthurs No of Coaching Days as a Cost Saving ~ which given how critical ensuring we have a decent Keeper to chase promotion is an insane decision 

We need a FT ( or close to FT ) Goal Keeping Coach 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jordanhill Jag said:

The Only way Bud can improve without getting Game Time is Coaching & we cut Kenny Arthurs No of Coaching Days as a Cost Saving ~ which given how critical ensuring we have a decent Keeper to chase promotion is an insane decision 

We need a FT ( or close to FT ) Goal Keeping Coach 

 

We applaud the club trying to run at break even JJ. You may have suggested this once or twice as a preferred course of action. We can’t rely on handouts and cup runs every year after all!!

(😂)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, madcapmilkdrinker said:

We applaud the club trying to run at break even JJ. You may have suggested this once or twice as a preferred course of action. We can’t rely on handouts and cup runs every year after all!!

(😂)

I have never at any point suggested that you cut anything related to the Football Coaching Side - in very simple terms the Goalkeeper is a Key Part of the Football Product & can be the weakest link - at the time of the decision to cut the hours of the Goal Keeping Coach there were multiple options for savings 

In Business the one thing you don't do is cut the Quality of your Core Product 

We do not need Handouts nor Cup Runs to increase the amount of Coaching to our Goalkeepers   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jaggernaut said:

Really? And do we also need a FT full-back coach, and a FT central defending coach, and a FT winger coach etc etc?

 

We have Coaches who cover the Squad a GK Coach is a different type of Coach from outfield Players - how will our GK Improve if there not being Coached ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...