yoda-jag
-
Posts
4,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by yoda-jag
-
-
sunday vader you still trolling this thread?
ten out of ten for persistent effort and delusion, five out of ten for laughs, zero out of ten for proof, give you i will.
. the thing about the flat earth is it can be proven, You can prove the earth is flat, the globe is based only in theory.
oh really?
http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/top-10-ways-to-know-the-earth-is-not-flat/
thankyou. and goodnight.
ps ..... no doubt you will use your default defence retort of it's propaganda to stop humans questioning it ..... so if you are going to respond to me, prove to me and every one reading this thread on each of the ten points on link, one by one, detailed and actual proof, that they are all false ..... and how they are proven to be possible in a flat earth.
unless you can do this, you are doing nothing except embarrassing yourself further with every nonsense post you make here.
-
You guys are cruel.
no we are not.
what is cruel, is that jackie judas "give me lots of money and more i'm not entitled to, but i won't pay my own debts" snakenamara, is not yet bankrupt or has relegated york to the conference and is jobless and signing on at the dole office for a retraining scheme to qualify as a binman.
all these will happen though, some sooner than others, but happen they will.
-
Muzzy said on the pre match interview on the official site that he's not 100% fit yet.
fitter and faster than anyone of the opposition last night he was
-
What poor soul had to stick his face in Tomas's erse for that picture?
isn't it obvious?
think about it ..... who in our squad is used to being down under hmmm?
-
^^^^^ account hacked by sundayman
-
watched one of your suggested videos sundayman, a video that was stunningly daft and ignores so many factors of reality.
from it, did pick up that we are apparently surrounded by a wall of ice, one hundred and fifty metres high ..... not two miles high as you have informed us all ..... even you can't get your lies correct
so much more i could write to destroy your assertions and beliefs, but have many better, as well as worse things to do with my time ..... so, like others, i'm out
-
Fear this might be a case of a mischievous agent?
100% correct
one hundred per cent correct you say, hmmm?
like you say the earth is flat, one hundred per cent, hmmm?
-
"Our budget will not be right up there, we will be in the bottom two in the league"
if true, see i cannot, any of the trio plying their trade up there next season
-
one of the andy gorams is drunk again and over six years late with his tweet.
it's that, or he thought yesterday was first of april.
-
Looks like a great signing....... ?
six months on .....
http://ptfc.co.uk/news/2015-2016/april_2016/edwards_commits_until_2017
signs a one year contract extension to summer twenty seventeen, with option of another year on top
-
1
-
-
I think that Saints beating Hearts has probably blown our chance of 4th. If we make it, we are likely to be 5 or 6 points behind them post split, which will be tough to catch when 3 of the 5 games will be Celtic, Aberdeen and Hearts.
But stranger Jaggy things have happened.
no disagreement with your analysis, except forgetting you are, the perth saints are our bitches this season, so we're down to two or three points differential to potentially overcome.
jaggy dreams are best.
-
To give a rough Idea. Antartica is in fact the outside edge
what a lovely picture.
what's on the other side of the ice wall, hmmm?
and can you show us all a picture of flat earth from side on?
bless you.
-
Do any pictures exist of this 2 mile high wall of ice, also I assume the ice sits on the bottom of the sea in a fully water tight seal with the seabed otherwise the water would leak out
and is the ice wall still two miles high or is global warming melting it, and that is the real danger to earth, once the ice wall melts, we die?
-
too early, but finish pre split strong, no reason we can't then get set of results post split to get fourth and potentially be talking about a european adventure or six.
booked your summer holidays, i hope no one has.
-
When discussing our match, it came to the 'better say something about Thistle' bit.
Don't know the name of the presenter but his question to Nevin was, "What about Thistle? A lot of people thought they would be in trouble this season."
Nevin, with a surprised look, replied, "Not me."
-
players treating remaining pre-split matches as three cup finals ..... potential highest league placing in generations, let's have turnouts and vocal backing of the team worthy of such occasions.
-
4
-
-
Archie must go ..... straight to ptfc boardroom and sign three year contract extension
for you, fixed it
-
the reason the water does not flow over the edge is that we are surrounded by the 2 mile high wall of ice. there are no poles just the centre.
can't let this one slide before log off.
two mile high wall of ice you say hmmm?
mount everest is twenty nine thousand and twenty eight feet above sea level ..... five and a half miles above sea level that is ..... why can't you see the wall of ice from the top of mount everest on a clear day hmmmm? ..... even using binoculars or telescope hmmmm?..... or the highest peak closest to antartica and this two mile high wall of ice ..... aconcagua in south america, and also second highest peak in world, at twenty two thousand eight hundred and thirty seven feet also known as four and a third miles high ..... why can't they see the wall of ice (or even over it) if there is no horizon and the earth is flat?
-
This is true all images are false, also these facts you speak of are also a fabrication. The compass only points to the centre, no flights ever cross the Antarctic, All communication systems are ground based, and your last is the rub. When a ship crosses over the supposed Horizon, it simply is brought back into to view with a telescope or binoculars, there is no curvature.
There are no satellites in space, and NASA never went to the Moon. I don't profess to know all the answers that is why I recommend Eric Dubays 200 truths, Jeranism or The Morgile, all with convincing questions.
thanks for the late sunday night chuckles.
found this reply to norge high on the laughmonitor. rather than obliterate them all down one by one, address just one as it is late.
emboldened part ..... so no curvature, we only need to use telescope or binoculars to see a ship on horizon ..... so why do they disappear from view through binoculars or telescope, is that them falling off the edge of the flat earth? ..... oh no they can't because of the wall of ice that surrounds the earth, so when ship does disappear from view through binoculars or telescope, that must be them hitting the wall of ice hmmmm? ..... so why can't we see the wall of ice through binoculars or telescope no matter what direction we point them in hmmmm?
-
I'm trying to build a picture of the world in my head. I'm using the UN flag as my starting point.
This world thing must have a thickness so I'm imagining a biscuit tin. With the UN flag printed on the top.
What is the height of the tin, approximately? And this 2 mile high wall of ice, is that 2 miles from sea level? And does it go all around the sides of the tin to the bottom?
And the bottom of the tin, or should we call it the dark side, what is it made of?
Is this UN biscuit selection in orbit around the sun? And the sun, of course, is also a biscuit tin?
I'm struggling with this, to be honest.
mr bowen a shorter version of my post #25 that is, but as you will see from his eventual reply #32 answer the questions i posed, he did not, avoided them he did.
as for the emboldened part, don't believe sabbath if he utters the oft repeated lie that the bottom of the biscuit tin flat earth is indeed the dark side ..... i can categorically state there is no truth to the falsehood people like sabbath peddle that there is a portal to and from the dark side just below the biscuit tin, and that whenever there is a earthquake on earth, it is actually a result of hapless hans driving the millennium falcon and not being able to brake it quick enough from warp speed and the falcon thus bounces off the underside of the biscuit tin and that is where earthquakes come from.
-
Time for a Doolan special?
at the moment you typed that, doolan did indeed put in a special ball
-
1
-
-
Didn't make myself too clear on that. What I meant was within the "fans" shareholding at the time there was one fella (or maybe more) holding most of the strings. That's who I referred to as "interim stewardship". He was keen to realise his investment and saw the US bid as a way out. Split the fans as no due diligence (or not enough) was being carried out.
old age has that affect on centurions (or near centurions) such as i and you.
on your overall point though, yes, that's close to how i recall it shaking down ..... but fact remains, dfc fans through their supporters society had majority control of over 50% of their club yet they allowed a situation to develop where they saw their majority control and say to be diluted and they became ultimately an irrelevance ..... as the chant goes (if it was ever sung) "fan ownership and you fvcked it up"
-
Yip, big gulf between thinking it's ideally a good idea and actually achieving fan ownership. At Dundee the interim stewardship pushed thru the American investment that resulted in the fanbased shares being diluted. Had the Dee fans accumulated more of a holding (I think they may have had just above 25%) they might well have rejected the US offer. I don't think there's an equivalent in the Dundonian language of what we know as "due diligence".
We may tho' be on surer footing than at Dundee if you look upon the Weir investment as our "interim stewardship". Our problem (likely to be Motherwell's as well) is, as Ian says, the size of our attendances. Very much like a golf club with not enough members it would be an uphill struggle. To get rank and file Jags fans investing in shares will require something tangible in return, a membership scheme perhaps. You can't just expect blind loyalty.
first emboldened point ..... the dfcss held, prior to the texan takeover, 51% of the club ..... so they effectively controlled the club ..... however, their shareholding was subsequently diluted to 25% by them voting later to issue a raft of new shares which the texans bought up to gain control of dundee. quick search confirms original 51% shareholding http://www.thecourier.co.uk/sport/football/supporters-society-to-keep-majority-shareholding-in-dundee-fc-after-mail-mix-up-1.47444
second emboldened point ..... how about a membership scheme that gives supporters a stake, but also results in the scrapping of season tickets but ensures a much lower entry price for those in the membership scheme? although the hull city scheme doesn't mention any fan ownership, the basis of the idea is there, all ptfc would need to do is ensure the membership scheme is structured accordingly to enable a fund to be built up for taking over the club, while drawing enough from the membership scheme to maintain or increase the managers budget? http://www.hullcitytigers.com/news/article/201617-season-memberships-save-up-to-282-when-you-sign-up-for-next-season-3009633.aspx
-
earth calling sabbath ..... please answer the questions
so the earth is flat, hmmmm?
let's for a minute imagine i haven't had chewie and hapless hans do a flyby of earth in the millennium falcon with me in it, or that i've never visited the earth from space, or seen it in rear view mirror of the falcon as i've left it to train jedis in other galaxies ..... and i am only a mortal human whose feet has never left the ground.
in that imaginary situation now are we, good, begin i will.
if the earth is truly flat .....
what does the flat surface of the earth sit on?
or is this flat earth floating around on? water, or is it space, or what other entity or substance?
if antartica is a wall, the edge of the world, what is beyond it that the military are guarding? and does antartica surround the earth on all four sides, and if it does can you show me how? if it doesn't surround the flat earth, why doesn't the water in the oceans drain away by falling off the edge of the earth?
that bright burny looking thing in the sky that we sometimes see, that rises on one side of this flat earth, travels slowly across sky and then sets on the other side ..... is that a real round planet of fire, or is that flat too, or is it a cgi effect projected on a big screen canopy that covers the earth? and if it is not fake, how does the burny bright round planet jump from one side of the flat earth when it sets back later to where it rises again next day ..... does someone switch the burny light off or does it have a cloaking device?
same goes for all these other allegedly round planets people see in the night sky ..... are they not round either or like the often rarely seen bright burny thing are they projected onto this big canopy screen that covers the flat earth like a roof?
and if it isn't a real galaxy we see above us and other galaxies we see from standing on this flat earth, and these are not real planets, stars, and galaxies we see, but are in fact cgi on this big canopy screen, who invented this technology and how many millions or billions of years ago was it constructed?
i've many more questions but specific answers to these questions will do for now.
thanks in advance, now let us pray for the truth to come out.
Sorry, haven flown in the cockpit of an aircraft at altitude I've seen the curvature of the earth.
Haven flown the "Santa route" over the pole, and been in the south Atlantic there are 2 poles
If the earth isn't round then explain why the water goes a different direction down the tap in the UK compared to say the Falklands in the Southern Hemisphere
Explain why days shorten into winter and lengthen into summer as the earth rotates on an elliptical arc round the sun
Explain a lunar or solar eclipse
Explain tides
Explain why no one has fallen off the end of the earth, or why we have oceans that haven't poured off the end of the world
Steven Lawless
in Main Jags forum
Posted
see all this chat of reprimanding him, fining him or terminating his contract?
i don't think any of these would send out the right message.
instead of terminating his contract, we should terminate him.
get his severed head on a long pole atop the bing advertising scaffolding.
and to even it up, i'd suggest sticking chic charnleys head on another long pole.
let it serve as a warning to all.
one team in glasgow.
we don't play in blue we don't play in green, red and yellow are the colours we love, the colours of partick thistle football club