Jump to content

John Blutarsky

Members
  • Posts

    422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Blutarsky

  1. Re-reading what I posted, obviously it was their keeper who was responsible for the injury but it was certainly a dangerous bit of play and an outrageous decision by the ref to take no action, not even speaking to the keeper. I just can't understand anyone who thinks that was a 50-50 untended incident ... to me the keeper had no other idea that to go straight through Lawless.

     

    Even if the ref viewed the collision as a coming together he should have stopped the game immediately as it was clear that Lawless had got a face/head injury. A very poor call from the Beaton.

  2. I concur Wo63.

     

    Only thing to add that I haven't seen on any other threads is Morton defender producing a fine one handed save from Sinky's shot on the turn in the dying seconds (about 8.50 in).

     

    Was 95% certain at the time. No doubt at all now.

     

    Anyway, onwards to the title.

    • Like 1
  3. It would have been wrong to pull it back for a penalty after the advantage had been played.

     

    It would have been entirely consistent with the rule if he had awarded a penalty.

     

    The ref didn't play advantage anyway, he just didn't judge it to be an infringement. Same with the earlier 'penalty' incident, which was a tackle from behind.

  4. I thought Forbes was lucky not to be subbed as I felt he contributed very little defensively and caused us to be overrun at times in midfield. His quality at set-pieces is invaluable although they weren't up to the usual high standard yesterday.

     

    A fully fit Rowser with games under his belt to bring on as a sub for Forbes and break up Rovers impressive second half midfield moves was the obvious solution. Not an option available to us unfortunately.

     

    Forbes reminds me of Ian Cameron much more so than Chic. Who to pick for the midfield? Not a bad problem to have.

     

    Triple awesome performance yesterday - passed a test of character with flying colours, which is all the more remarkable when you consider the average age of the squad and the relative youth of the management team.

     

    My finest time as a Jags fan.

  5. nope, sorry, I chucked it after about 20 screens (and still less than 30% through) when asked to give my rankings on who is more influential within the structure of the SFA: the compliance officer or the Professional Game Board.

     

    wtf?

     

    And if enough fans give them the message that we don't know/don't give a flying about what the governing bodies see as priorities, at least it gives SD a solid baseline to argue for supporters priorities.

     

    It is badly designed but in my experience so are a lot of surveys on survey monkey that are designed by novices.

×
×
  • Create New...