jaggybunnet

some one else who needs to get over themselves, surely you can take a joke ...bloody hell you suppor(ted) the snp and the yes camp.

get over yourself

Just replying to your post, the rest is all in your head

fixed that for you

we didn't want the vow and i wish they had stayed away as all it did was muddy the waters, i don't know ANYONE who voted no for more dev in fact the other way, i know someone who votedyes to try and scare more powers out of Westminster LOL.

he is a troll so stop feeding him

the monster raving Green party, not a clue, scroll down and watch the clip, it is not all about defense and there is plenty more she has no clue about as well, it was like listening to the snp. http://forces.tv/27087381 why would anyone vote for such a ridiculous party with ridiculous policies.

LOL keep taking the meds

welsh on bench

Ukip have mps?people standing in ALL the nations of the UK snp don't, its not rocket sience

ok then let them in BUT then you HAVE to invite EVERY other party. it is rubbish and would be pandering to the snp again, they can be involved in the Scottish TV as they should be .

the main debates are for parties that have mps or people standing as mp in the whole of the UK not just in Scotland, i wouldn't agree with any of the other countries doing it so why would i agree to Scotland doing it just because snp are having another hissy fit.

why? they are Scottish only party while UKIP and the green party are UK, snp can take part in the Scottish TV debates to be honest they are a waste of time so i would bin them.

oh dear, the UK gov is trying to sort the issue with the deficit down by half which will mean the debt will reduce in years to come, Scotland on the other hand wants to stop the cuts and spend which means a higher deficit which along with all the rest of the issues i posted before means we would be screwed. add to that that Scotland isn't owed money from other countries to off set this and well, blame Westminster all you like but the yes camp could not come up with a plan that would in anyway make things better.

Scotland runs at a deficit, (last year £8.6bn, snps own numbers) and that's including all the oil income from that the snp/yes camp think they would get. the savings year on year from getting rid of trident would have been around £500 mill (and that's without going near our share for moving them so only £8.1 bn to find. add to that the loss of tax take due to the halving of the price of a barrel and the chunk taken off for the "fund", we would have been massively worse off. none of the above even touches the side when you include the share of the UK debt, the fall out from losing the EU subsidies/grants when we would have left the EU and the problems and costs from starting a new currency. yes Scotland may take in more tax that the rest of the UK but if you are spending more than you take in its irrelevant. basically if you earn 100 grand a year people will think you are rich but if you are spending 150 grand you are still screwed ask sevco, Scotland with the issues above would struggle massively to service that especial as the wanted to stop the cut and spend even more money.

they must have tons of cash eh. nice wee ashly will step in with another loan then http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30774504

i may be wrong and maybe someone else that was there can confirm or deny it but what i took it as being that the money was extra I.E. directors putting there hands in there pockets to pay for individuals as it seemingly was last year be it to allow players to be released or for new players to be brought in.

the cup for.......well anybody....please

Maxy stated at the EEOS meeting that Archie would have funds for Jan if he needed as they did the previous jan.

the talk on the falkirk forum is that they might be looking to sign Dools!! half way down first page. would cost them. http://www.onefinfalkirk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29574&sid=0e207adf94deb5a6343fcdc65996d6dc

it was tougher that we thought, still better off than under independence.

yes debt is going up and will continue to for a few years yes but at a lower rate, it is the deficit that the government say is coming down which is a different thing.

given your pro yes camp posts before it wasn't really was it

if you like, the yesnp could come out with ANYTHING to show otherwise i might...but you cant so you just keep on living in what ever fantasy world that you inhabit.

Again, you are taking that if that is the case it wasn't yes camp that were doing it, as for the bar code i don't know. in a nutshell the yes camp kept going on about how bad things were , yet the still failed to get a landslide vote for yes, surely give how bad thing are it would be the easiest thing in the world to show how we would be better off under independence.......but they couldn't because we would have been far worse off.