Yes a director can represent a specific group in a board but still have a Responsibility to all shareholders I’m surprised you don’t know that
no I’m trying to say the obvious that any decision of the board cannot be overturned by shareholders because at least 55% if shareholders would vote against so it won’t happen
legal action would be the only remedy available
I think the distinction between theory and practice is getting lost .... but I suspect your not a Marxist
all your legal points are pretty dependent - assuming there was any basis for legal action - on someone actually doing that and funding it ... you ?
As 3BC own the club I would think they do as would the BOD ....they would be transferring their shares to this new body ...only an opinion I’m not in any loop
Ffs
individual directors can ‘represent ‘ shareholders on a board
if the board have 55% of the shares good luck with trying to overturn their decision
have you the funds to take the club to court ?
How about you stop being ultra pedantic .... it is BASED on the Motherwell model and we will all take it from there ....
I don’t go into your earlier posts on the distinction between 3BC , the board and company law as I think your co fusing yourself
I think you are missing the reality that a bod are there to look after the interests of shareholders - yes I know all shareholders - and the biggest shareholders get more say .... and directors do represent blocks of shareholders
this is a small private club not a plc