I didnt want to enter into this at all as I thought it would detract from what should be an interesting thread about what the manager had to say. However, after your first statement and now the second one highlighted above, I feel I have to offer my tuppence worth. I think you are totally out of order to call into question someones loyalties to the Jags as they have no interest in joining the Jags Trust. That will be the same Jags trust with pretty much the same people who seemed more concerned with sexism on the board than any real matters at the last meeting I attended. The same Jags Trust who's members are intent on maintaining their grip on it even if it means the organisation itself suffers? The same Jags Trust who's attitude has been, quite frankly, appaling at just about every other gathering I have been to to try and lend support. The same Jags trust that told me that "It doesnt really matter what you think as you dont have a vote" when Propco first reared its ugly head and an open meeting was called for fans to discuss it (I think i was one of only 2 or 3 non JT board members who turned up to it) - Again these are my own opinions on the trust and merely using them to illustrate my point rather than have this turn into a Jags Trust debate.
If I, or anyone else for that matter (LeChic above), wanted to try and go along to a meet the manager night and offer a donation rather than joining then I can see an argument for that being reasonable. Fair play for going along anyway in the hope of getting in as he was showing some interest in his team. Couldnt the argument be made that Thistle mean more to him than those who didnt give it a go? Fair enough, you may disagree but your comments about what Thistle means to him are, quite frankly, insulting.