Sam Leitch Loyal Posted August 2, 2012 Report Share Posted August 2, 2012 another 4 mad koreans like the sig banned from the olympic badminton for phannying about and changing the rules of the game while in play - deservedly binned for taking the piss (hint hint mods!) Were they not from the U.S. puppet-state of South Korea? Be careful - that's how wars start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigesige00 Posted August 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2012 I actually like this idea, however I don't understand the part in bold. Why would a replacement player join the game once it is over? O, was my English bad? I meant that in the case of straight red-card, the team must play with 10 players (or in the case of 2nd straight red-card, 9 players). And about the number of players. In Futsal, the number of on-pitch players is 5 and the number of a squad is 12. 12/5 is 2.4. So, if we multiply 11 by 2.4, the number is 26.4. The number of a squad is 23 in the World Cups. So 23-player squad is not a strange idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twinny Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 O, was my English bad? I meant that in the case of straight red-card, the team must play with 10 players (or in the case of 2nd straight red-card, 9 players). And about the number of players. In Futsal, the number of on-pitch players is 5 and the number of a squad is 12. 12/5 is 2.4. So, if we multiply 11 by 2.4, the number is 26.4. The number of a squad is 23 in the World Cups. So 23-player squad is not a strange idea. It's a further test of a manager's ability to choose five players from his squad that could have the most impact coming from the bench, and then during the game to select up to three of them. I think seven is too many, as seen in the SPL and in England. At SFL1 level very few teams have 23 players to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda-jag Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 (edited) What's wrong about my opinion? (x 20) Unfunny Comedian you are. I think that this is very logical. Of course YOU do. Thank you for telling me about wordpress. Bye then. Edited August 3, 2012 by yoda-jag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda-jag Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 It's a further test of a manager's ability to choose five players from his squad that could have the most impact coming from the bench, and then during the game to select up to three of them. I think seven is too many, as seen in the SPL and in England. At SFL1 level very few teams have 23 players to choose from. Going by siguesiguespunkniks loonychoons logic and posts, he should be along soon piping up "i think all teams without 23 player squad should be abolished". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigesige00 Posted August 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Silly offenses continue. So I have to answer. Japan's F-League (National Futsal's top-flight) consists of 10 teams. Only 1 team is professional, and other 9 teams are part-time. However, every team has not only 12-player first team, but also reserve team. If part-time Futsal team can have 12-player first team and reserve team, why can SFL team not have 23 players? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twinny Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Silly offenses continue. So I have to answer. Japan's F-League (National Futsal's top-flight) consists of 10 teams. Only 1 team is professional, and other 9 teams are part-time. However, every team has not only 12-player first team, but also reserve team. If part-time Futsal team can have 12-player first team and reserve team, why can SFL team not have 23 players? Because full-time footballers need full-time wages, and most clubs can't afford that. We have a reserve team too, but that consists of some first team players and some u19s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamiltonjag Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Let's stop feeding this maniac. He was funny/quirky at first but now he's getting beyond irritating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigesige00 Posted August 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Because full-time footballers need full-time wages, and most clubs can't afford that. We have a reserve team too, but that consists of some first team players and some u19s. Yes, that's OK. A 23-Player squad including youth is fine. Is there any problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SookeJag Posted August 3, 2012 Report Share Posted August 3, 2012 Is there any problem? Yes, one. I'll give you three guesses and the first 2 don't count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.