The statement made it clear that the Chairman and Chief Executive had discussed the potential new owners' business model with the Trust, so they could have added that. After all, it exists to act as "a voice for Partick Thistle fans", not a little clique that's given enough exclusive access to information to allow it to take a position without balloting its members.
You seem very reluctant to question why it wouldn't communicate that information, or why, if Mr Beattie sees fit to discuss these details with the Trust, why he wouldn't share the vision with the wider fan base that it purports to represent. I find that odd of you.
What's also slightly strange is that it seems that the statement re. board changes wasn't issued by the club's communications team, but by a third party. I'd be interested to know if that third party is being employed by the club, a single shareholder or the group of shareholders that initiated the change - those same shareholders who're ready to cash in, apparently. it's all a bit weird, isn't it?