Funniest (though unintentional, I think) post that I've read here in some time. Unless you are referring to yourself ironically, then it's faintly amusing.
This is a cute but desperate attempt by you to deflect attention away from your stated support of professional footballers being allowed to do what they like in their "private" lives, that it's of no consequence for their role as a footballer. It's perfectly clear, surely to you as well, that the private vs public distinction these days is not clear-cut, and when it comes down to something like standards of behaviour towards children, then the distinction is even less important. You can call my comparison of teachers and footballers as role models for children "insane" if you like, but you're the one that appears to be ranting, caught out by your own indefensible statement and now lashing out with little depth of thought.
If you want to maintain a consistent position, you shouldn't care what school teachers get up to in their "private time", as long as their "interests" or "leisure preferences" don't manifest themselves in the classroom. Well, I do care, and I also care about what footballers, athletes, politicians, musicians, and others do when it comes to giving them any support, and certainly when it comes to suggesting to children that this is what they should aspire to.