yoda-jag

see all this chat of reprimanding him, fining him or terminating his contract? i don't think any of these would send out the right message. instead of terminating his contract, we should terminate him. get his severed head on a long pole atop the bing advertising scaffolding. and to even it up, i'd suggest sticking chic charnleys head on another long pole. let it serve as a warning to all. one team in glasgow. we don't play in blue we don't play in green, red and yellow are the colours we love, the colours of partick thistle football club

sunday vader you still trolling this thread? ten out of ten for persistent effort and delusion, five out of ten for laughs, zero out of ten for proof, give you i will. oh really? http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/top-10-ways-to-know-the-earth-is-not-flat/ thankyou. and goodnight. ps ..... no doubt you will use your default defence retort of it's propaganda to stop humans questioning it ..... so if you are going to respond to me, prove to me and every one reading this thread on each of the ten points on link, one by one, detailed and actual proof, that they are all false ..... and how they are proven to be possible in a flat earth. unless you can do this, you are doing nothing except embarrassing yourself further with every nonsense post you make here.

no we are not. what is cruel, is that jackie judas "give me lots of money and more i'm not entitled to, but i won't pay my own debts" snakenamara, is not yet bankrupt or has relegated york to the conference and is jobless and signing on at the dole office for a retraining scheme to qualify as a binman. all these will happen though, some sooner than others, but happen they will.

fitter and faster than anyone of the opposition last night he was

isn't it obvious? think about it ..... who in our squad is used to being down under hmmm?

^^^^^ account hacked by sundayman

watched one of your suggested videos sundayman, a video that was stunningly daft and ignores so many factors of reality. from it, did pick up that we are apparently surrounded by a wall of ice, one hundred and fifty metres high ..... not two miles high as you have informed us all ..... even you can't get your lies correct so much more i could write to destroy your assertions and beliefs, but have many better, as well as worse things to do with my time ..... so, like others, i'm out

one hundred per cent correct you say, hmmm? like you say the earth is flat, one hundred per cent, hmmm?

"Our budget will not be right up there, we will be in the bottom two in the league" if true, see i cannot, any of the trio plying their trade up there next season http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35940884

one of the andy gorams is drunk again and over six years late with his tweet. it's that, or he thought yesterday was first of april.

six months on ..... http://ptfc.co.uk/news/2015-2016/april_2016/edwards_commits_until_2017 signs a one year contract extension to summer twenty seventeen, with option of another year on top

no disagreement with your analysis, except forgetting you are, the perth saints are our bitches this season, so we're down to two or three points differential to potentially overcome. jaggy dreams are best.

what a lovely picture. what's on the other side of the ice wall, hmmm? and can you show us all a picture of flat earth from side on? bless you.

and is the ice wall still two miles high or is global warming melting it, and that is the real danger to earth, once the ice wall melts, we die?

too early, but finish pre split strong, no reason we can't then get set of results post split to get fourth and potentially be talking about a european adventure or six. booked your summer holidays, i hope no one has.

players treating remaining pre-split matches as three cup finals ..... potential highest league placing in generations, let's have turnouts and vocal backing of the team worthy of such occasions.

for you, fixed it

can't let this one slide before log off. two mile high wall of ice you say hmmm? mount everest is twenty nine thousand and twenty eight feet above sea level ..... five and a half miles above sea level that is ..... why can't you see the wall of ice from the top of mount everest on a clear day hmmmm? ..... even using binoculars or telescope hmmmm?..... or the highest peak closest to antartica and this two mile high wall of ice ..... aconcagua in south america, and also second highest peak in world, at twenty two thousand eight hundred and thirty seven feet also known as four and a third miles high ..... why can't they see the wall of ice (or even over it) if there is no horizon and the earth is flat?

thanks for the late sunday night chuckles. found this reply to norge high on the laughmonitor. rather than obliterate them all down one by one, address just one as it is late. emboldened part ..... so no curvature, we only need to use telescope or binoculars to see a ship on horizon ..... so why do they disappear from view through binoculars or telescope, is that them falling off the edge of the flat earth? ..... oh no they can't because of the wall of ice that surrounds the earth, so when ship does disappear from view through binoculars or telescope, that must be them hitting the wall of ice hmmmm? ..... so why can't we see the wall of ice through binoculars or telescope no matter what direction we point them in hmmmm?

mr bowen a shorter version of my post #25 that is, but as you will see from his eventual reply #32 answer the questions i posed, he did not, avoided them he did. as for the emboldened part, don't believe sabbath if he utters the oft repeated lie that the bottom of the biscuit tin flat earth is indeed the dark side ..... i can categorically state there is no truth to the falsehood people like sabbath peddle that there is a portal to and from the dark side just below the biscuit tin, and that whenever there is a earthquake on earth, it is actually a result of hapless hans driving the millennium falcon and not being able to brake it quick enough from warp speed and the falcon thus bounces off the underside of the biscuit tin and that is where earthquakes come from.

at the moment you typed that, doolan did indeed put in a special ball

old age has that affect on centurions (or near centurions) such as i and you. on your overall point though, yes, that's close to how i recall it shaking down ..... but fact remains, dfc fans through their supporters society had majority control of over 50% of their club yet they allowed a situation to develop where they saw their majority control and say to be diluted and they became ultimately an irrelevance ..... as the chant goes (if it was ever sung) "fan ownership and you fvcked it up"

first emboldened point ..... the dfcss held, prior to the texan takeover, 51% of the club ..... so they effectively controlled the club ..... however, their shareholding was subsequently diluted to 25% by them voting later to issue a raft of new shares which the texans bought up to gain control of dundee. quick search confirms original 51% shareholding http://www.thecourier.co.uk/sport/football/supporters-society-to-keep-majority-shareholding-in-dundee-fc-after-mail-mix-up-1.47444 second emboldened point ..... how about a membership scheme that gives supporters a stake, but also results in the scrapping of season tickets but ensures a much lower entry price for those in the membership scheme? although the hull city scheme doesn't mention any fan ownership, the basis of the idea is there, all ptfc would need to do is ensure the membership scheme is structured accordingly to enable a fund to be built up for taking over the club, while drawing enough from the membership scheme to maintain or increase the managers budget? http://www.hullcitytigers.com/news/article/201617-season-memberships-save-up-to-282-when-you-sign-up-for-next-season-3009633.aspx

earth calling sabbath ..... please answer the questions