Asylum Resident Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 (edited) Royal transparency advances in recent years is about to be wiped away in one move ! How f***ing dare they not be accountable to me ! Link Edited January 8, 2011 by Asylum Resident Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaggybunnet Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Royal transparency advances in recent years is about to be wiped away in one move ! How ******* dare they not be accountable to me ! Link why? you publishing all your accounts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackpool Jags Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 why? you publishing all your accounts? Further defence of the idefensible. Do you believe that the publication of AR's accounts would be in the public interest? This excerpt shows what a thoroughly rotten shower Betty's mob are: "Sweeping changes to the Freedom of Information Act will reverse advances which had briefly shone a light on the royal finances – including an attempt by the Queen to use a state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace – and which had threatened to force the disclosure of the Prince of Wales's prolific correspondence with ministers." Aye, no business of the public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norgethistle Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 why? you publishing all your accounts? I do as does the whole population of Norway, our "tax list " is aavailable on the net and tells what you earned what you owe and how much you have in cash and assets, not saying its right but they have the transparency for every one from the wee woman that cleans the factory at the bottom to the king at the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaggybunnet Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Further defence of the idefensible. Do you believe that the publication of AR's accounts would be in the public interest? This excerpt shows what a thoroughly rotten shower Betty's mob are: "Sweeping changes to the Freedom of Information Act will reverse advances which had briefly shone a light on the royal finances – including an attempt by the Queen to use a state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace – and which had threatened to force the disclosure of the Prince of Wales's prolific correspondence with ministers." Aye, no business of the public. pretty much a non story with hardley anyone bothering to show it and poss even a bit of speculation on the independent again thats chips showing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i@n Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 The sooner we get rid of this pathetic tourist attraction the better. But we're British don't you know and we love taking it up the arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodstock Jag Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 (edited) Royal transparency advances in recent years is about to be wiped away in one move ! How f***ing dare they not be accountable to me ! Link Completely unnecessary changes. Should be more transparency not less. Not that the public purse should be funding them anyway... Edited January 8, 2011 by Woodstock Jag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianlucatoni Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 (edited) The sooner we get rid of this pathetic tourist attraction the better. But we're British don't you know and we love taking it up the arse. That sounds like a line from throbbing gristle an aw! Edited January 8, 2011 by gianlucatoni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meister Jag Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Completely unnecessary changes. Should be more transparency not less. Not that the public purse should be funding them anyway... At last a post I actually agree with! Well done Woody boy and a little bit more power to your market analyst/anarchist elbow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meister Jag Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 pretty much a non story with hardley anyone bothering to show it and poss even a bit of speculation on the independent again thats chips showing Jaggy, why is it if you take an opposing view that you always refer to chips? With you it seems to be chips wi' everything. This weeks top tip for the landed country gent: get more exercise and lay aff the chips! Might even help your gout and HBP. Just a thought. Socialist and showing compassion to royalists. My mother would be proud. It's the socialist bit she hates. You'd love her, picture of Her Maj and Winston on the living room wall, still trying to find her picture of Maggie (removed and burned under cover of darkness) and as for her "Princess of hearts" tea set; a work in progress, I break something every time I visit. Needs must and all that. What was it Philip Larkin said about your mum and dad again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodstock Jag Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 At last a post I actually agree with! Well done Woody boy and a little bit more power to your market analyst/anarchist elbow! If there's one thing worse than slimebag politicians it's inherited claim to sovereignty along bloodlines at the taxpayers' expense. Both waste the money that is stolen from the taxpayer for negligible benefit in return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackpool Jags Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 If there's one thing worse than slimebag politicians it's inherited claim to sovereignty along bloodlines at the taxpayers' expense. Both waste the money that is stolen from the taxpayer for negligible benefit in return. Aw naw, you were doing so well there tae. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McKennan Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 I love the royals. I am thinking of spending thousands of quid for a hair transplant so's I can have a forelock to tug at the wedding. I regret that I don't yet have children who'll go out and lay down their lives in honour of the Windsors. If I do have kids and there's no war I'll just take them into a muddy field and blow their brains out. Dulce et decorum est, you know how it is. God bless you, Mam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazy davie Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 God bless you, Mam. Ma'am Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asylum Resident Posted January 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Ma'am As in jam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McKennan Posted January 22, 2011 Report Share Posted January 22, 2011 Ma'am Mam, as in the Irish gal who brung me into the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.