I think JJ has a point. Simply put, I would like to know what our board’s approach to budgeting is, given the loss incurred from last season and the need to constantly marry promotion ambitions with sustainability. Are there scenarios in which we take calculated risks (e.g., if DU goes up but a club like Livi - who likely wouldn’t overspend to go back up - comes down, do we “go for it” and spend a little more ourselves?)
I am willing to accept that the position was so dire that we needed urgent funding to stabilize things, but I’d like to be reassured that this isn’t the go-forward plan. I’d prefer the majority of McClymont’s money be used as a safety net or an investment into something revenue generating, not the player budget.
Side question - was there a web conferencing component to this AGM? Or was it only available to direct shareholders and not beneficiaries?