Jump to content

MarciaBlaine

Members
  • Posts

    310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MarciaBlaine

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Rutherglen

Recent Profile Visitors

5,777 profile views

MarciaBlaine's Achievements

Jags fan

Jags fan (1/1)

164

Reputation

  1. As far as I understood it, it means players can be supported to study alongside playing. It follows schemes that are popular in the USA, the likes of which Luke McBeth took part in.
  2. I'd say a lot of our need will stem from how Wilson wants to set us up, and we don't really know what that means yet. If we continue from last season with 1 striker, for example, then I could live with a main one and Diack. Equally, if we play a back 4, we can just about manage with the 3 centre backs we have and someone like Dolan as a 4th choice, plus it then frees up McBeth as an option in defensive mid. Conversely, a regular back 3 means, at minimum, adding another CB as additional cover. Not saying we should necessarily play in any of those particular ways, but recruitment needs to be shaped by team shape - and hopefully not the other way around!
  3. I think we're seeing a bit of a systemic issue here. With 3 choices from 36 numbers, each ticket has a 1 in 7140 chance of winning. When multiple people play, the chances of there being a winner each month obviously comes down, so it's all about the volume of players. If 10,000 (!) tickets were sold each month, by month 3 there'd be an almost 99% chance of having a winner. Something more realistic for us, 800 tickets per month, means that after an entire year there's still only a 74% chance of anyone having won the jackpot at all. Or to sum up, with a smaller fanbase such as ours, this scheme is destined to have many, many rollovers. Nice for the person who eventually wins it, but it does give the monthly announcements a bit of a groundhog day feel.
  4. Absolutely. I'm sure he's a bit raw at the moment.
  5. 1 Dunfermline 2 Raith 3 Ayr (or some variation of this top 3, but this is where I'm landing) 4 St Johnstone 5 Thistle (or less likely, Thistle 4th, St J 5th) 6 Arbroath 7 Ross County 8 Airdrie (again I think these 3, from 6th to 8th, will be much of a muchness) 9 Morton 10 Queens Park
  6. If we had a minimal number of midfielders signed up, I'd keep Bannigan because he's been very good since coming back into the side imo. The problem is we have so many other contracted midfielders, several of whom I'd happily ship out before Banzo is shown the door, but we're likely stuck with them. Putting it another way: if we could treat our midfield like an old school Etch-a-Sketch and start from the beginning again, I'd have no qualms about putting him in the picture, but the screen's already crowded and I'm not sure there's space for him.
  7. I heard we're down to a shortlist of four
  8. He specifically says he was interviewed, the implication being at the same time as Graham, so that would mean the shortlist of four that was bandied about wasn't correct. However I suppose it's possible Wilson was interviewed on Wednesday after Graham turned the job down.
  9. I find Dabrowski to be an excellent shot stopper but his kicking is pretty dire. Bud was very good with his feet. So I guess it depends how we're set up to play.
  10. There's been no mention of Wilson, either in the shortlist of four or today's strong rumours that it's BBG getting the job. From that, I wonder if no longer being a co-manager means Graham will need to retire from playing. I'm feeling more certain that, one way or another, we've seen the last of him in a Jags shirt. As an aside, I wonder if we could afford Ross Docherty if it saves us an assistant manager's wage...
  11. The trick is to think of the dullest, least inspiring combo available: St Johnstone, Hamilton, East Fife and Clyde for me.
  12. Would welcome him 100%, but suspect he can command wages beyond what we can offer.
  13. Och, I wish I knew. I do though think we have the potential to do it - we're in a big city without the erse cheeks' baggage, and can be a really attractive proposition. There's a potential audience there, no doubt. But I'm not going to pretend I've cracked the code on how it'd happen. Credit where it's due, 'kids go free' was exactly that kind of long-term thinking and it's certainly been successful in bringing in more punters who are now paying customers. My point really was that using up our energies on trying to achieve the impossible or downright lucky, year on year, is to me a bit of wasted effort and it'd be a castle built on sand if performances ever dropped along with crowds. Build the foundations and we could afford the management, players and facilities that would sustain us in the top flight.
×
×
  • Create New...