Jaggernaut

Konichi wa - Good afternoon.

What would that be, then. And how many examples can you think of in the British Isles, for example?

I just learned today about the manner in which Falkirk won last week. They scored in about the 97th minute. They got a penalty and missed, the keeper saving and putting it out for a corner. Instead of holding his head in his hands with a look of horror like all of the big stars on tv do, the guy who missed the penalty ran over and immediately took the corner, from which the Bairns scored. Now that's what you call a good attitude!

Those are all reasonable points. But I'd reckon that a wheelchair-only section within the enclosure would be feasible alongside a number of standing supporters.

Great idea!

You're costing me a fortune!

Great to learn that you've taken the decision to come over to the dark side!

No chip. You didn't answer my questions, but feel free not to bother.

I'll sing that when I'm sixty-four.

But only as long as Scotland remains subservient to its Westminster masters? How will you feel about being Scottish, and Scotland, when independence comes. Will your pride diminish? If so, why? Another question: Do you believe that the majority of English MPs at Westminster act with the best interests of Scotland at heart, on an equal footing with England?

Don't want to watch that.

So, if more and more of them don't even want us in their "union"; does that mean that you would go begging them to keep you because you'd feel inadequate without their motherly control over us?

This may be hard for you to read, as it isn't your own type of propoganda. It's from the Herald, an anti-SNP newspaper: ""THE SNP Government is to renew calls for greater economic powers north of the Border after claiming there had been a historic shift in the public’s attitude towards the party. The Nationalists were given a further boost after a poll showed a rise in support across the UK for independence. With the first party conference since the Nationalists won a majority at Holyrood just days away, officials last night claimed the latest statistics strengthened the claim for Alex Salmond’s administration to get more economic teeth in the Scotland Bill. And last night the UK Government was warned it was appearing out of touch with the wishes of the voters. The latest Scottish Social Attitudes Survey for 2010 showed 74% of people thought the Holyrood Government ought to have most influence over how Scot- land is run compared with 16% for Westminster. Meanwhile, a ComRes poll found more voters across the UK support Scottish independence, 39%, up six percentage points since May, than are opposed to it, 38%, a fall of four percentage points."

Dammit, cannae make it this time. First one I'll have missed.

I bow to your less riddled memory.

I understand not a word, but it's clearly the story about John Lambie wringing a doo's neck as a threat to one of the players.

Altogether now (to the tune of Hare Krishna)...: F*** yer Harry, Harry Harry Harry Harry Harry Hood. Oh F*** yer Harry.... Ring any bells for anyone?

The Jags are Strachan, Rae, Campbell. Tims: Nae idea.

I've got that one!

I ask because the opposition (in Scotland, i.e., the British nationalists) are clutching at straws in the face of ever-growing support for Scotland regaining its rightful independence. They claim that waiting for the referendum is distracting the Government from its real task of governing the country. If the SNP called the referendum now, however, the unionists would cry out that this was deflecting people from the real task at hand, which should be working towards improving the economic and employment conditions etc etc. In other words, the unionists' reactions are simply knee-jerk, baseless conditioned responses against anything SNP-inspired. People are getting steadily wiser and less tolerant of Westminster-orchestrated anti-Scottish independence propoganda. What do I think would happen? The Con-Dem conmen (and women) would get slaughtered in a UK General Election if it got held tomorrow.

Yes, costly to do, for a couple of hundred people many of whom, presumably, would want to pay less than they currently do for the opportunity to sit or stand, as they like.

Catchy as hell, ain't they?

A question in response to Cameron's bluff of demanding that the independence referendum be called now rather than later in the Scottish Government's term, which was explicitly stated by the SNP before the votes were counted: If Cameron thinks that he and the Con Dems are doing the right thing for the British state, why don't they hold a General Election right now, rather than wait for another 3/4 years? What do you think the outcome would be?

Hmm... Tres interessant.....

"...McQuade turned out to be as mesmerising off the pitch as he was on it with McParland saying: “I was told that Denis would have me tearing my hair out at times and that is what happened. He turned up at training once with long hair and a moustache and I told him that was not appropriate for a professional footballer. He told me that he could not be denied his idiosyncrasies and I told him not to use big words!”"