Dr.D Posted November 26, 2010 Report Share Posted November 26, 2010 Divine intervention or not? Have they a direct line to the Big Man above? Are they all now running scared? Are the lightning bolts next in this crusade? watch this space! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazy davie Posted November 26, 2010 Report Share Posted November 26, 2010 He should have resigned ages ago. And he should have taken that clown McDonald with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianlucatoni Posted November 26, 2010 Report Share Posted November 26, 2010 He should have resigned ages ago. And he should have taken that clown McDonald with him. Agreed on Dallas who was certainly ill advised to forward such an email from work ... not agreed on McDonald though as referees lie and cobble stories together asll the time so get over it - but equally a church that hides dress wearing peados, has an ex nazi brownshirt at the helm, has dwindling attendances of its' own, a crumbling infrastructure and is becoming less relevant by the day should never have been allowed to comment on a sport and internal SFA disciplinary mechanisms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 Agreed on Dallas who was certainly ill advised to forward such an email from work ... not agreed on McDonald though as referees lie and cobble stories together asll the time so get over it - but equally a church that hides dress wearing peados, has an ex nazi brownshirt at the helm, has dwindling attendances of its' own, a crumbling infrastructure and is becoming less relevant by the day should never have been allowed to comment on a sport and internal SFA disciplinary mechanisms. Just a small correction needed. The present pope was never a brownshirt. He was in the Luftwaffe and at the end of the war served in an anti-aircraft gun crew. We do not know if he helped shoot down any of the Royal Air force terrorfliegen as they bombed Berlin. We do, however, know that his conscience got the better of him and he deserted his post on 30th April 1945. 30th April 1945 was the day Hitler committed suicide. Before anyone accuses me of bias against the present Holy Father, may I point out my heartfelt appreciation of Benedictus XVI: that's the delicious dry pilsner, brewed in Munich and named after the local boy who made good in Rome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Incredible Adam Spark Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) Agreed on Dallas who was certainly ill advised to forward such an email from work ... not agreed on McDonald though as referees lie and cobble stories together asll the time so get over it - but equally a church that hides dress wearing peados, has an ex nazi brownshirt at the helm, has dwindling attendances of its' own, a crumbling infrastructure and is becoming less relevant by the day should never have been allowed to comment on a sport and internal SFA disciplinary mechanisms. I wouldn't expect to see this level of hate, ignorance and bigotry on a Thistle forum. Edited November 27, 2010 by The Incredible Adam Spark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Incredible Adam Spark Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) Divine intervention or not? Have they a direct line to the Big Man above? Are they all now running scared? Are the lightning bolts next in this crusade? watch this space! I can't quite see the point of your little growly face. Dallas' position was becoming more untenable by the day. The email regarding the Pope's visit was simply the final entry in a catalogue of misdemeanours. The man is a liar and a bully. You won't see many referees in mourning for their fallen 'leader' this morning. Edited November 27, 2010 by The Incredible Adam Spark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Hosie Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 Dallas' position was becoming more untenable by the day. The email regarding the Pope's visit was simply the final entry in a catalogue of misdemeanours. The man is a liar and a bully. You won't see many referees in mourning for their fallen 'leader' this morning. So it would seem. This e-mail, or at least the image that appeared in it, was fairly wide spread though. I'm at least a little curious why it was Hugh Dallas, and of course he shouldn't have sent it from a work e-mail account*, that has been targeted over it and not everyone who circulated it. * or indeed from a personal e-mail account. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McKennan Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 Tom, the email wasn't just sent around within SFA circles by those concerned, it went to a wider 'audience' - an incredibly reckless move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christ_Puncher Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) Dallas just goes to prove the Referees and scottish football are anti celtic. I'm sayin that and i hate them. Theres too many decisions go against celtic like that fat b farry delaying cadetes signing then that goal that was about a mile onside he scored against rangers. Then the refs lying at the dundee utd game. Hundreds of decisions seem to go against Celtic and i honestly think rangers do get favouritism. What about lefferties tackle/assault in the old firm game about ayr ago? And rod Macdonald getting booked for blessing himself? I'm not even a catholic and i find that repulsive. And they even have the audacity to go on strike and go 'aww poor me' when they get it in the neckwhen it was them who dug their own grave by being corrupt, lying and incompetant. They created the storm. If they had just been honest and done their jobs none of this would have happened Edited November 27, 2010 by Christ_Puncher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meister Jag Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) So it would seem. This e-mail, or at least the image that appeared in it, was fairly wide spread though. I'm at least a little curious why it was Hugh Dallas, and of course he shouldn't have sent it from a work e-mail account*, that has been targeted over it and not everyone who circulated it. * or indeed from a personal e-mail account. I'm also amazed at how foolish he's been; but seen it happen on numerous occasions in my own place of employment. Some of the stuff that's been circulated that led to dismissal simply beggars belief e.g. sending porn to your dad! As a wise old head in my work said: "When you give the weans a new toy they'll play with it!" Edited November 27, 2010 by Meister Jag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eljaggo Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 5 employees have been sacked at SFA - so Dallas has not been singled out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Hosie Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 I'm also amazed at how foolish he's been; but seen it happen on numerous occasions in my own place of employment. Some of the stuff that's been circulated that led to dismissal simply beggars belief e.g. sending porn to your dad! As a wise old head in my work said: "When you give the weans a new toy they'll play with it!" Absolutely. My own rule is unless the e-mail is of the "cute cat" type of thing I don't forward it on, just delete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianlucatoni Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 I wouldn't expect to see this level of hate, ignorance and bigotry on a Thistle forum. This isn't bigotry I'm afraid - I was born into the catholic faith and spent my formative years as an altar boy in the St Aloysius parish in town but don't let my facts from the inside get in the way of your judicious choice of adjectives. nazi - fact brownshirt - corrected by milo retaining and hiding paedos - fact covering up the truth - fact dwindling church attendances - fact crumbling infrastructure - fact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy Thistle Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 What I find ironic is the catholic church, through out the disgusting scandals in Ireland, the catholic church were preaching forgiveness and tolerance. Yet in the case of Hugh Dallas they wanted retribution and punishment. They are just hypocrites Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MerryHell Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Dallas just goes to prove the Referees and scottish football are anti celtic. I'm sayin that and i hate them. Theres too many decisions go against celtic like that fat b farry delaying cadetes signing then that goal that was about a mile onside he scored against rangers. Then the refs lying at the dundee utd game. Hundreds of decisions seem to go against Celtic and i honestly think rangers do get favouritism. What about lefferties tackle/assault in the old firm game about ayr ago? And rod Macdonald getting booked for blessing himself? I'm not even a catholic and i find that repulsive. And they even have the audacity to go on strike and go 'aww poor me' when they get it in the neckwhen it was them who dug their own grave by being corrupt, lying and incompetant. They created the storm. If they had just been honest and done their jobs none of this would have happened Eh? Is this supposed to be tongue in cheek? Or are you actually serious ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda-jag Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Eh? Is this supposed to be tongue in cheek? Or are you actually serious ... Think that about almost every post by CP, i do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bunny Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Eh? Is this supposed to be tongue in cheek? Or are you actually serious ... I'm amazed at that post too. Now, Celtic were entitled to complain - as members of the SFA and the SPL and so on ... I think they were way over the top in their complaints but they were entititled to complain as they felt they were hard done by by people within the same body (or hired by them, i.e. the refs). The Catholic Church on the other hand should be keeping out of this. Especially as Reid had already raised the bigotry card. Dallas was stupid, but jokes about the Catholiic Church and Pedophilia have been going round the whole country - the way jokes about any big news event (including sick jokes about disasters) go round all the time. There's no evidence there was any bigotry involved in it. Considering that that story still is fresh in folks minds they'd have been better to keep quiet about it. Of course there still is bigotry in this country and it goes in all directions, not just anti catholic, but this is not the situation where they should be sticking their oar in. Celtic are using the various referees' stupidity to stick one on the refs (a wee bit of payback in their own biased view) and to put doubt in refs mind in future next time there's a key decision to be made in a game. The church should NOT be getting involved in that. If they feel there's something they need to say about bigotry they should wait until a more appropriate time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 This isn't bigotry I'm afraid - I was born into the catholic faith and spent my formative years as an altar boy in the St Aloysius parish in town but don't let my facts from the inside get in the way of your judicious choice of adjectives. nazi - fact brownshirt - corrected by milo retaining and hiding paedos - fact covering up the truth - fact dwindling church attendances - fact crumbling infrastructure - fact So in the interests of being balanced, would you mind reciting facts of numerous good things that the catholic church do. I presume you are as well versed with the positives as you are with the negatives. If your choice is simply to bring attention to the negatives, then I am afraid that factually makes you a bigot. I hope you are not, so may we have the positive balance from you please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 I'm amazed at that post too. The Catholic Church on the other hand should be keeping out of this. Especially as Reid had already raised the bigotry card. Dallas was stupid, but jokes about the Catholiic Church and Pedophilia have been going round the whole country - the way jokes about any big news event (including sick jokes about disasters) go round all the time. There's no evidence there was any bigotry involved in it. Considering that that story still is fresh in folks minds they'd have been better to keep quiet about it. Can I point out that the content of Dallas's email was derogatory to the leader of the Catholic Church, therefore they have every right to be involved in this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lady-isobel-barnett Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 So in the interests of being balanced, would you mind reciting facts of numerous good things that the catholic church do. I presume you are as well versed with the positives as you are with the negatives. If your choice is simply to bring attention to the negatives, then I am afraid that factually makes you a bigot. I hope you are not, so may we have the positive balance from you please. I think the poster would have to expound on an alternative (eg his own religious views) to be considered a bigot. True, he's listed only negatives but that doesn't mean he wouldn't list negatives about other religions if relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bunny Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 (edited) Can I point out that the content of Dallas's email was derogatory to the leader of the Catholic Church, therefore they have every right to be involved in this. Can I point out they only spoke out after this had been simmering for a bit. I haven't seen or heard any details of the content. Did it come out just before they commented? If not they have to accept people are entitled to be rude about the pope just as they are about anyone else including the prime minister, Iain Paisley and the royal family. Why Dallas was stupid and wrong was in being rude in an email that was bound to become public. When you're in a public position like he was you have to keep your opinions to yourself. And no I'm not saying it's OK to be a bigot as long as you're quiet about it, I'm saying being rude about the pope isn't necessarily bigotry. Especially when (as with the Royal Family, etc) there's a lot to be rude about. Edited November 28, 2010 by Mr Bunny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianlucatoni Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 (edited) And no I'm not saying it's OK to be a bigot as long as you're quiet about it, I'm saying being rude about the pope isn't necessarily bigotry. Especially when (as with the Royal Family, etc) there's a lot to be rude about. Truth be told - 'bigotry' is an easy card to play by the jokers in the pack ... criticise the catholic church/celtic/ireland (or the orange order/rangers/protestants) and you're castigated a bigot - in the same way anyone who dares to criticise Israel is branded anti-semetic ... it's easy to throw a two-bob word without actually discussing the point Edited November 28, 2010 by gianlucatoni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Can I point out they only spoke out after this had been simmering for a bit. I haven't seen or heard any details of the content. Did it come out just before they commented? If not they have to accept people are entitled to be rude about the pope just as they are about anyone else including the prime minister, Iain Paisley and the royal family. Why Dallas was stupid and wrong was in being rude in an email that was bound to become public. When you're in a public position like he was you have to keep your opinions to yourself. And no I'm not saying it's OK to be a bigot as long as you're quiet about it, I'm saying being rude about the pope isn't necessarily bigotry. Especially when (as with the Royal Family, etc) there's a lot to be rude about. Yes, thank you for the clarification, so I take it we can agree it is ok for the Catholic Church to have their say in this as it directly affected them, it is only their timing that concerns you. Totally agree that being rude about the pope is not necessarily bigotry, it is however still rude. While as you say there is a lot to be rude about, there is also a lot to congratulate the church on, probably more in fact. And when the rudeness of portraying only one polar opinion displays such a derogatory and biased view, surely that is the description of bigotry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee jim Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 It might just be my age (been round the block a few times) but all this po faced declaring by people that they are deeply insulted and offended at the Dallas email. What was it about the Hokey Cokey again? Mr Reid the so called political attack dog, offended! Aye right). Jeezo it was an email! doing the rounds showing a satirical school sign. Something that Have I got News For You might use. Well maybe not. Catholics, and others, should get a grip and cut out all this feigning of pious indignation. We get enough of that stuff from the Moslems. There are a lot more other things the church should be concerned about. You can say that again. But there is nothing like a nice diversion. Unless of course that church is so closely linked to a football club, which in itself is a bit dubious, then I suppose the email is an ideal club the beat a referee over the head with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionel J. Botch Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 If rumours are to be believed this has some way to go yet. Davie Provan mentions it in his bit in the NOTW today. What if, just what if, Celtic have proof of some wrong doing. Jeez oh, where does that leave Scottish football? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.