Jump to content

Dare I Say It


SussexJag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wasn't worried when paton left - believed that he would be easy to replace.

 

This has been proved wrong - a tough guy with leadership ability on and off the park would in my view be v helpful - as we seem to be getting out-muscled / overrun at times, don't seem to be organised at set pieces, and the heads go down a bit when we go behind, or when pressure doesn't lead to goals.

 

So whatever the daftness around his departure (led mainly by him) it looks like he was a big loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Osbourne over Paton every day of the week for me.

 

It doesn't have to be either/or. Paton's leadership is what is being touted here rather than playing skills and I can see where the OP is comming from. I'm not sure that Welsh is as strong when we suffer a setback. I'm also not convinced that Erskine is the answer either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It doesn't have to be either/or. Paton's leadership is what is being touted here rather than playing skills and I can see where the OP is comming from. I'm not sure that Welsh is as strong when we suffer a setback. I'm also not convinced that Erskine is the answer either.

 

Ideal scenario would be Ozzy and Paton together.

 

Patons range of passing over the top to the over lapping full backs really helped us last season. He was able to change wings of attack very quickly.

 

This season we have been quite laboured switching from one wing to the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recall ever hearing or reading that Paton was a great guy in the dressing room or that he really influenced the team. He was quite vocal during matches though and captained the team. Also, I agree his distribution and drive was good to have.

 

Osbourne is a better player than Paton and more experienced in the Premiership/SPL.

 

Fraser is a better passer than Paton, some his balls and range of passes/crosses were superb.

 

Osbourne and Fraser combined should be tried.

 

Whether Fraser plays for us again, we will have to wait and see. Hopefully Archie can broker a deal to extend his loan or sign him. Worth a shot imo.

 

Edited to add... agree with Jaggernaut ^

Edited by mhs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paton didn't feature very much towards the end of last season, and he wasn't missed. The one who is being missed is Erskine.

I don't recall ever hearing or reading that Paton was a great guy in the dressing room or that he really influenced the team. He was quite vocal during matches though and captained the team. Also, I agree his distribution and drive was good to have.

 

Osbourne is a better player than Paton and more experienced in the Premiership/SPL.

 

Fraser is a better passer than Paton, some his balls and range of passes/crosses were superb.

 

Osbourne and Fraser combined should be tried.

 

Whether Fraser plays for us again, we will have to wait and see. Hopefully Archie can broker a deal to extend his loan or sign him. Worth a shot imo.

 

Edited to add... agree with Jaggernaut ^

 

:happy2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the major disappointments is that we never got to see last year's side with Erskine & Paton against top flight sides. Erskine provided those special touches but I recently looked through the highlights for some of our games early last season and realised how influential Paton had been, both in winning challenges but also in hitting raking diagonal passes to set up attacks. We didn't play as fluently towards the end of the season - Ramsdens Final for example - when he wasn't in the side.

 

Osborne has done a tremendous job as a ball-winner but he contributes very little going forward. Is this part of the reason our midfield has not been as effective in supporting the lone striker this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the major disappointments is that we never got to see last year's side with Erskine & Paton against top flight sides. Erskine provided those special touches but I recently looked through the highlights for some of our games early last season and realised how influential Paton had been, both in winning challenges but also in hitting raking diagonal passes to set up attacks. We didn't play as fluently towards the end of the season - Ramsdens Final for example - when he wasn't in the side.

 

Osborne has done a tremendous job as a ball-winner but he contributes very little going forward. Is this part of the reason our midfield has not been as effective in supporting the lone striker this season?

 

We've also moved Welsh into a more defensive roll, and no disrespect to the lad, but i don't recall a game yet, where i've thought "oh welsh was a stand out today, he grabbed that game by the scruff of the neck."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think Erskine would be contributing much to our team at this point in time. He would never be given enough time on the ball in this league, with the team under constant pressure from the opposition. From the stats I wouldn't know how he's doing up at United; but they're an all round stronger team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Osborne has done a tremendous job as a ball-winner but he contributes very little going forward. Is this part of the reason our midfield has not been as effective in supporting the lone striker this season?

 

Great respect for Paton but when he took over the holding role from Shug Murray he rarely ventured any further up the park than Osbourne has done this season. The point about central midfielders not getting forward to support Doolan is most valid but that certainly shouldn't be the responsibility of Osbourne. Indeed it wouldn't be Paul Paton's responsibility either had he stayed on. That duty falls on whoever the other two central mids are (from Craigen, Welsh and Bannigan usually}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great respect for Paton but when he took over the holding role from Shug Murray he rarely ventured any further up the park than Osbourne has done this season. The point about central midfielders not getting forward to support Doolan is most valid but that certainly shouldn't be the responsibility of Osbourne. Indeed it wouldn't be Paul Paton's responsibility either had he stayed on. That duty falls on whoever the other two central mids are (from Craigen, Welsh and Bannigan usually}

It clearly wasn't/isn't the role of either Paton or Osborne to feed off Doolan but the point I was making was that Paton regularly hit quick, penetrating passes for our full-backs to run on to - that was the team's trademark last season. Osborne wins the ball and gives a short pass - that doesn't stretch the opposition and puts the onus on the likes of Welsh, Bannigan and Craigen to create an opening rather than get upfield to support the striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess my other thoughts here are 1. Did Paton lead in a way we now miss. 2. Would him an Osborne be ideal. So is maybe Welsh and / or Craigan not really good enough attacking wise (in a league full of Paton / Osborne equivalents) to offset their lack of defensive quality.

 

Really depressing - am saying we need more aggression / bite etc. and only some are saying we'd do better with Erskine.

 

Football = the new rugby. Lots of big / strong / fast people who have no ability.

 

So there you have it, the perfect circular argument with no coherence from me. Sorry guys!

 

Hope we f-ck Hibs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...