Jump to content

Loaned Players: Subsequent Careers


Jaggernaut
 Share

Recommended Posts

This question randomly (?) came to me as I was frying up tonight's dinner (not loaned).:

What players who've come to us on loan have returned to their "parent" club and gone one to be a big success with the team that lent them to us?

Anybody?

I thought: maybe Dorrans and Wilkinson did "pretty" well. But who else (particularly OF players) went on to show that they had benefited from playing for PTFC and also significantly benefited PTFC? And I started to think about this especially from the point of view of "OF" loanees.....

Has anybody from either of the two erse cheeks who came to us on loan ever gone on to become a big success at either porkheid or eyepox? If not, doesn't this say something about our continued willingness to beg for take on what maybe those clubs have already identified as expendable (or even dross)? If so, why do we keep on doing it?

One could argue that it's almost a (small) part of the overall scheme within Scottish football to preserve the privileged position of the two erse cheek teams at all costs, including the future of the clubs that take on those rejects loanees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never quite understood why Leon Constantine’s loan spell in 2002 lasted for only 2 games. 100% win record and got to take part in a Martin Hardie funky chicken goal celebration at Falkirk. Went on to play for 20 clubs in lower reaches of English leagues and also non league. 91 goals in total, including 2 very prolific goal every second game spells at Southend and Port Vale. At one point rose as high as Leeds United.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jaggernaut said:

This question randomly (?) came to me as I was frying up tonight's dinner (not loaned).:

What players who've come to us on loan have returned to their "parent" club and gone one to be a big success with the team that lent them to us?

Anybody?

I thought: maybe Dorrans and Wilkinson did "pretty" well. But who else (particularly OF players) went on to show that they had benefited from playing for PTFC and also significantly benefited PTFC? And I started to think about this especially from the point of view of "OF" loanees.....

Has anybody from either of the two erse cheeks who came to us on loan ever gone on to become a big success at either porkheid or eyepox? If not, doesn't this say something about our continued willingness to beg for take on what maybe those clubs have already identified as expendable (or even dross)? If so, why do we keep on doing it?

One could argue that it's almost a (small) part of the overall scheme within Scottish football to preserve the privileged position of the two erse cheek teams at all costs, including the future of the clubs that take on those rejects loanees.

You could almost say the same about players we loan to other clubs. But just as an aside, what is the point in going on and on about the old firm.(not you in particular).It’s not going to change and it just diverts focus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lenziejag said:

You could almost say the same about players we loan to other clubs. But just as an aside, what is the point in going on and on about the old firm.(not you in particular).It’s not going to change and it just diverts focus. 

That's right. So, from all the responses, it seems that players who go out on loan might well go on to have a successful career, but rarely at the club who sent them out on loan! (Doolan is one of the rare exceptions.) 

In other words, being told by the boss that "You're going out on loan to get more experience" for 90% of the players means that "You're already heading out the door."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jaggernaut said:

That's right. So, from all the responses, it seems that players who go out on loan might well go on to have a successful career, but rarely at the club who sent them out on loan! (Doolan is one of the rare exceptions.) 

In other words, being told by the boss that "You're going out on loan to get more experience" for 90% of the players means that "You're already heading out the door."

You could also add Bannigan, although his injury has certainly had a deteriorating effect on him. And, it is early days but fingers crossed James Lyon has success with us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me there's two categories of loanee. There's the standard thought to have potential type loanee (usually a youngster) that's sent out from his parent club to get game time.  Then there's the ones sent out from s club (perhaps to reduce their wage bill) that we've a chance of signing. I suppose their club may look on them as potentially surplus to requirement. Ones we've a good chance of signing the following season. Balatoni, Welsh, Tiffoney, Erskine (return) all spring to mind. There's something just a bit more joiny up about bringing in a player on loan who we've a chance to sign. Doesn't always work out like Keown, but normally there's that bit extra insurance knowing the guy will fit in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, partickthedog said:

Any benefit that may have come from Kevin Nisbet's various loans did not accrue to Thistle.

It's often the other way round. We send hopefuls out when they're OK mentally for a loan spell but perhaps not quite up to the physicality of the lower leagues. Kevin was physically up for it. In fact he was no longer benefitting much from U20s/Reserve football for that very reason. Unfortunately for us and his early career he probably (self admitted)wasn't there mentality wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2023 at 10:32 AM, lady-isobel-barnett said:

For me there's two categories of loanee. There's the standard thought to have potential type loanee (usually a youngster) that's sent out from his parent club to get game time.  Then there's the ones sent out from s club (perhaps to reduce their wage bill) that we've a chance of signing. I suppose their club may look on them as potentially surplus to requirement. Ones we've a good chance of signing the following season. Balatoni, Welsh, Tiffoney, Erskine (return) all spring to mind. There's something just a bit more joiny up about bringing in a player on loan who we've a chance to sign. Doesn't always work out like Keown, but normally there's that bit extra insurance knowing the guy will fit in.

Keown was good in his first season for us, seemed to lose confidence & form after that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...