Jump to content

New Manager Thread


Recommended Posts

If we're offering £40k p.a. as a wage I'm not sure what sort of candidate we expect to recruit? At this level there aren't many experienced candidates available and the money on offer isn't going to be enough to entice people to relocate

If its say McCall or Barrowman well I'd rather for for McCall when you compare the players McCall has found versus what Barrowman did for Raith.  

Also if Graham is the head coach does he not need someone a lot more experienced such as McCall who he presumably has a decent relationship with already?

I could see McCall being quote good with youth development and identifying signing targets, that was always his strength.

Where McCall might be more of an issue was on budgets. If he's sporting director then is he not meant to be the guy saying we can only afford so much, whereas as a manager he was always pressuring the board to release funds for more players. So what we he do if his signings didn't work out?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jaggy said:

Where are you getting £40k from? Is that not for the business development manager?

 

Apologies, looking at the advert for sporting director is just says "negotiable plus performance related bonus"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be really disappointed if McCall is being considered for any position at Firhill. He was sacked for good reason and is part of the past. 


If he’s appointed, you really need to question the competence of the board of directors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Third Lanark said:

Agree.  If it was as a manager or coach it would be a definite no for me.  But as a SD looking for players is ideal for him

There's more to being a SD than just looking for players though. That's just a scout.

I'd have serious concerns about McCall's experience, abilities and general persona transfering into a board level strategic role.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big Col said:

I’d be really disappointed if McCall is being considered for any position at Firhill. He was sacked for good reason and is part of the past. 


If he’s appointed, you really need to question the competence of the board of directors.

The reason was losing two games to bottom Clubs and funny enough Graham had been sent off 

what has that to do with a role as Sporting Director ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jordanhill Jag said:

The reason was losing two games to bottom Clubs and funny enough Graham had been sent off 

what has that to do with a role as Sporting Director ? 

 

Look at the role description. Can you honestly say that he matches that and is a good fit?

You’ve said before that the club shouldn’t live in the past. But your opinion on this topic appears to run contrary to that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian McCall doesn't have the qualifications to carry out the role of a Sporting Director.

I therefore find it very strange that he has been interviewed for the post. Unless the board isn't actually looking for a Sporting Director after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jag said:

Ian McCall doesn't have the qualifications to carry out the role of a Sporting Director.

I therefore find it very strange that he has been interviewed for the post. Unless the board isn't actually looking for a Sporting Director after all.

What are the qualifications required to be a Sporting Director? If there was a financial role to it I get that might require specific things on the CV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Lambies Lost Doo said:

Do we have confirmation he's been interviewed?

 

7 hours ago, BowenBoys said:

Perhaps he was just dropping off his tracksuit. At last!

Or meeting Owen Coyle in Jaconellis for a coffee?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jag said:

Ian McCall doesn't have the qualifications to carry out the role of a Sporting Director.

I therefore find it very strange that he has been interviewed for the post. Unless the board isn't actually looking for a Sporting Director after all.

Or maybe we dont actually need a Sporting Director ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Big Col said:

Look at the role description. Can you honestly say that he matches that and is a good fit?

You’ve said before that the club shouldn’t live in the past. But your opinion on this topic appears to run contrary to that.

Why Does a Club the Size of Thistle need a "Sporting Director" ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jordanhill Jag said:

Why Does a Club the Size of Thistle need a "Sporting Director" ? 

Totally agree - we don’t. It’s a ridiculous waste of money. I’d rather see the money spent on the paying squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jordanhill Jag said:

Why Does a Club the Size of Thistle need a "Sporting Director" ? 

I think if you do away with the titles it's not really much difference from past situations. The Sporting Director is in effect the manager with one major difference. The Head Coach replaces what would have been the assistant manager. Obviously the major difference is the Head Coach will now pick the team, be in control of training, and be in overall  charge during match time. 

Tho' I'm not advocating McCall for the job he's not too bad an example. His strengths are behind the scenes, player recruitment, sourcing players and general man-management. He's not as strong on in-game management and reportedly delegated training anyway.

In theory it should mean an easier transition for a younger person taking on the role of Head Coach. Just now you can have all the basic tactical nous and all the badges going. But if you can't source the right players and your man-management skills are under developed you'll not last as a manager. 

Another benefit would be if your Head Coach moves on there would be less turmoil. Similarly if the Sporting Director leaves there'll be no change to day to day training and playing matters.

I realise I'm not answering why/if PTFC can afford both a Sporting Director and a Head Coach. A matter of quality naturally comes into that costing. I am pointing out that theoretically it's more a case of reallocation of duties than extra man power. 

   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...